Advertisement

Validation and Comparison of Nutrient Intakes from Two Dietary Questionnaires Developed for the Multiethnic Cohort Study

Published:September 30, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2022.09.016

      Abstract

      Background

      Quantitative food frequency questionnaires (QFFQs) are often used to measure dietary intakes in large cohort studies but the impact of updating these questionnaires over time is not often examined.

      Objective

      This study compared nutrient intakes estimated from two different QFFQs to each other and to intakes calculated from three 24-hour dietary recalls (24HDRs).

      Design

      This study used a cross-sectional design.

      Participants/setting Participants

      Participants (N = 352) were members of the Multiethnic Cohort Study from five racial and ethnic groups (African American, Japanese American, Latino American, Native Hawaiian, and White) who lived in Hawaii and Los Angeles. They were recruited in 2010 and asked to complete two QFFQs, two months apart, and three 24HDRs in the time between completion of the QFFQs. One questionnaire had been developed for a baseline survey (baseline QFFQ) at the start of the Multiethnic Cohort Study during 1993-1996, and the other was updated for a follow-up study 10 years later (10-year QFFQ).

      Main outcome measures

      Daily intakes of energy and nine nutrients were estimated from both QFFQs, and from the average of three 24HDRs.

      Statistical analyses performed

      Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between log-transformed nutrient intakes from each QFFQ and the 24HDRs and between the two QFFQs overall, by sex, and by race and ethnicity.

      Results

      Correlations for the 10-year QFFQ with the 24HDRs (average = 0.45) were higher than for the baseline QFFQ (average = 0.41), although the differences were not statistically significant. The increase in correlations was particularly pronounced for Native Hawaiian and African American participants. When absolute values were adjusted for energy intake, the average correlations were higher at 0.57 for the baseline QFFQ and 0.58 for the 10-year QFFQ overall and this pattern was seen in most racial and ethnic subgroups. The average correlations between the two QFFQs were 0.73 for both absolute intakes and nutrient densities overall.

      Conclusions

      Correlations of nutrient intakes between the two QFFQs and 24HDRs were similar, and intakes from the two QFFQs were highly correlated. QFFQs updated for changes to the food supply may provide improved assessment for cohort studies that include diverse populations.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Willett W.
        Food frequency methods.
        in: Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, 2012: 70-95
        • Thompson F.E.
        • Subar A.F.
        Dietary assessment methodology.
        in: Coulston A. Boushey C.J. Ferruzzi M. Delahanty L.M. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. 4th ed. Elsevier Academic Press, 2017: 5-48
        • Cade J.
        • Burley V.
        • Warm D.
        • Thompson R.
        • Margetts B.
        Food-frequency questionnaires: a review of their design, validation and utialisation.
        Nutr Res Rev. 2004; 17: 5-22
        • Stram D.O.
        • Hankin J.H.
        • Wilkens L.R.
        • et al.
        Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 358-370
        • Kolonel L.N.
        • Henderson B.E.
        • Hankin J.H.
        • et al.
        A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 346-357
        • Kang M.
        • Boushey C.J.
        • Shvetsov Y.B.
        • et al.
        Changes in diet quality and body weight over 10 years: the Multiethnic Cohort Study.
        Br J Nutr. 2021; 126: 1389-1397
        • Park S.Y.
        • Kang M.
        • Shvetsov Y.B.
        • et al.
        Diet quality and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality in cancer survivors and non-cancer individuals: the Multiethnic Cohort Study.
        Eur J Nutr. 2022; 61: 925-933
        • Park S.Y.
        • Shvetsov Y.B.
        • Kang M.
        • et al.
        Changes in diet quality over 10 years are associated with baseline sociodemographic and lifestyle factors in the Multiethnic Cohort Study.
        J Nutr. 2020; 150: 1880-1888
        • Blanton C.A.
        • Moshfegh A.J.
        • Baer D.J.
        • Kretsch M.J.
        The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately estimates group total energy and nutrient intake.
        J Nutr. 2006; 136: 2594-2599
        • Moshfegh A.J.
        • Rhodes D.G.
        • Baer D.J.
        • et al.
        The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 88: 324-332
        • Schatzkin A.
        • Kipnis V.
        • Carroll R.J.
        • et al.
        A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2003; 32: 1054-1062
        • Murphy S.P.
        • Martin C.L.
        • Davison N.
        • et al.
        A comparison of two systems for entering and assessing dietary data for a research study..
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109: 905-908
        • Murphy S.P.
        Unique nutrition support for research at the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii.
        Hawaii Med J. 2002; 61 (17): 15
        • Jahns L.
        • Conrad Z.
        • Johnson L.K.
        • et al.
        Diet quality is lower and energy intake is higher on weekends compared with weekdays in midlife women: a 1-year cohort study.
        J Acade Nutr Diet. 2017; 117: 1080-1086
        • Willett W.
        Correction for the effects of measurement error.
        in: Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, 2012: 287-304
        • Wilcox R.R.
        Comparing dependent robust correlations.
        Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2016; 69: 215-224
      1. Statistical Analysis System..
        (Version 9.4. SAS Institute, Inc)
        www.sas.com
        Date: 2013
        • Willett W.
        • Sampson L.
        • Stampfer M.J.
        • et al.
        Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 122: 51-65
        • Kaaks R.
        • Slimani N.
        • Riboli E.
        Pilot phase studies on the accuracy of dietary intake measurements in the EPIC project: overall evaluation of results. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.
        Int J Epidemiol. 1997; 26: S26-S36
        • Kumanyika S.K.
        • Mauger D.
        • Mitchell D.C.
        • et al.
        Relative validity of food frequency questionnaire nutrient estimates in the Black Women's Health Study.
        Ann Epidemiol. 2003; 13: 111-118
        • Jaceldo-Siegl K.
        • Knutsen S.F.
        • Sabaté J.
        • et al.
        Validation of nutrient intake using an FFQ and repeated 24 h recalls in black and white subjects of the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2).
        Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13: 812-819
        • Subar A.F.
        • Kipnis V.
        • Troiano R.P.
        • et al.
        Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158: 1-13
        • Kipnis V.
        • Subar A.F.
        • Midthune D.
        • et al.
        Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158: 14-21
        • Freedman L.S.
        • Schatzkin A.
        • Midthune D.
        • Kipnis V.
        Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103: 1086-1092
        • Kroke A.
        • Klipstein-Grobusch K.
        • Voss S.
        • et al.
        Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 70: 439-447
        • Prentice R.L.
        • Mossavar-Rahmani Y.
        • Huang Y.
        • et al.
        Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 174: 591-603
        • Willett W.C.
        • Hu F.B.
        Not the time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire: point.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 1757-1758
        • Dwyer J.
        • Picciano M.F.
        • Raiten D.J.
        • Members of the Steering Committee
        National Health and Nutrition Examination Survery. Collection of food and dietary supplement intake data: what we eat in America–NHANES.
        J Nutr. 2003; 133: 590S-600S
        • Freedman L.S.
        • Commins J.M.
        • Moler J.E.
        • et al.
        Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2014; 180: 172-188

      Biography

      L. R. Wilkens and L. Le Marchand are professors, S.-Y. Park is an associate specialist, C. J. Boushey is an associate research professor, and L. N. Kolonel and S. P. Murphy are professors emeriti, Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu. M. Kang is BK assistant professor, BK21 FOUR Education and Research Team for Sustainable Food & Nutrition, Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, and a researcher, Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu. A. Sawyer is a BS student, School of Biological Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology and School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. D. L. Au is a researcher, Punahou School, Honolulu, HI. H.-Y. Paik is a professor emeritus, Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, and director, Center for Gendered Innovations for Science and Technology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea. C. A. Haiman is a professor, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.