Advertisement

Environmental and Climate Impact Perceptions in University Students: Sustainability Motivations and Perceptions Correspond with Lower Red Meat Intake

Published:September 20, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2022.09.015

      Abstract

      Background

      Red meat production is a leading contributor to food-related greenhouse gas emissions. Decreasing red meat intake can mitigate climate change and lower risk of diet-related diseases.

      Objective

      The goal of this study is to evaluate university students’ perceptions of climate-friendly behaviors and to assess how these perceptions are associated with the frequency of red meat intake.

      Design

      Cross-sectional survey

      Setting

      A large, public California university and a large, public Michigan university

      Participants

      Undergraduate students from a California university (n = 721) and a Michigan university (n = 568)

      Main Outcome Measures

      Perceptions of climate-friendly behaviors and frequency of red meat intake

      Statistical Analysis

      Differences in perceptions by student characteristics were compared using t-tests and one-way analysis of variance. Associations between perceptions of climate-friendly behaviors and red meat intake frequency were examined using generalized linear models, adjusted for sociodemographic covariates.

      Results

      Across both universities, students rated reducing meat intake as less effective than other climate change mitigation behaviors such as recycling and using less plastic. However, students who reported (1) making food and beverage choices that “are good for the environment,” (2) making food and beverage choices that “reduce climate change impact,” or (3) agreeing that “eating less meat is an effective way to combat climate change” reported 10% to 25% lower frequency of red meat intake for each point higher on the agreement scale. In contrast, making food and beverage choices motivated by health was not associated with frequency of red meat intake.

      Conclusions

      Sustainability motivations and perceptions of meat’s climate impact were associated with lower frequency of red meat intake, despite the overall moderate rating of eating less meat as an effective climate change mitigator. This research lends support to behavioral interventions, public education campaigns, and policies aiming to reinforce sustainable dietary patterns in young adults.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Watts N.
        • Amann M.
        • Ayeb-Karlsson S.
        • et al.
        The Lancet countdown on health and climate change: From 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health.
        The Lancet. 2018; 391: 581-630
        • Rose D.
        • Heller M.C.
        • Roberto C.A.
        Position of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior: The importance of including environmental sustainability in dietary guidance.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019; 51: 3-15
        • Poore J.
        • Nemecek T.
        Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers.
        Science. 2018; 360: 987-992
        • Godfray H.C.J.
        • Aveyard P.
        • Garnett T.
        • et al.
        Meat consumption, health, and the environment.
        Science. 2018; : 361
        • Hartmann C.
        • Siegrist M.
        Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review.
        Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2017; 61: 11-25
        • Tilman D.
        • Clark M.
        Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health.
        Nature. 2014; 515: 518-522
        • Willett W.
        • Rockström J.
        • Loken B.
        • et al.
        Food in the anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.
        Lancet. 2019; 393: 447-492
        • Springmann M.
        • Godfray H.C.J.
        • Rayner M.
        • Scarborough P.
        Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 113: 4146-4151
        • USDA
        Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025.
        9th ed. 2020
        • Davitt E.D.
        • Winham D.M.
        • Heer M.M.
        • Shelley M.C.
        • Knoblauch S.T.
        Predictors of plant-based alternatives to meat consumption in midwest university students.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021; 53: 564-572
        • Shaw A.
        • Capetola T.
        • Lawson J.T.
        • Henderson-Wilson C.
        • Murphy B.
        The cost of sustainability in higher education: Staff and student views of a campus food culture.
        Int J Sustain Higher Ed. 2018; 19: 376-392
        • Campbell-Arvai V.
        Food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours among university undergraduates: A mixed-methods study.
        Int J Sustain Higher Ed. 2015; 16: 279-295
        • De Groeve B.
        • Bleys B.
        Less meat initiatives at Ghent University: Assessing the support among students and how to increase it.
        Sustainability. 2017; 9: 1550
        • Kamenidou I.C.
        • Mamalis S.A.
        • Pavlidis S.
        • Bara E.-Z.G.
        Segmenting the generation Z cohort university students based on sustainable food consumption behavior: A preliminary study.
        Sustainability. 2019; 11: 837
        • Sánchez L.A.
        • Roa-Díaz Z.M.
        • Gamba M.
        • et al.
        What influences the sustainable food consumption behaviours of university students? A systematic review.
        Int J Public Health. 2021; : 66
        • Pelletier J.E.
        • Laska M.N.
        • Neumark-Sztainer D.
        • Story M.
        Positive attitudes toward organic, local, and sustainable foods are associated with higher dietary quality among young adults.
        J Acad Nutr Dietetics. 2013; 113: 127-132
        • Robinson-O’Brien R.
        • Larson N.
        • Neumark-Sztainer D.
        • Hannan P.
        • Story M.
        Characteristics and dietary patterns of adolescents who value eating locally grown, organic, nongenetically engineered, and nonprocessed food.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009; 41: 11-18
        • Larson N.
        • Laska M.N.
        • Neumark-Sztainer D.
        Do young adults value sustainable diet practices? Continuity in values from adolescence to adulthood and linkages to dietary behaviour.
        Public Health Nutrition. 2019; 22: 2598-2608
        • Nelson M.C.
        • Story M.
        • Larson N.I.
        • Neumark-Sztainer D.
        • Lytle L.A.
        Emerging adulthood and college-aged youth: An overlooked age for weight-related behavior change.
        Obesity. 2008; 16: 2205
        • Sawyer S.M.
        • Afifi R.A.
        • Bearinger L.H.
        • et al.
        Adolescence: A foundation for future health.
        Lancet. 2012; 379: 1630-1640
        • Leung C.W.
        • Wolfson J.A.
        • Hsu R.
        • Soster K.
        • Mangan S.
        • Falbe J.
        Warning labels reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake among college students.
        J Nutr. 2021; 151: 179-185
        • Dutta-Bergman M.J.
        Developing a profile of consumer intention to seek out additional information beyond a doctor: The role of communicative and motivation variables.
        Health Commun. 2005; 17: 1-16
        • Dutta-Bergman M.J.
        An alternative approach to social capital: Exploring the linkage between health consciousness and community participation.
        Health Commun. 2004; 16: 393-409
        • de Boer J.
        • de Witt A.
        • Aiking H.
        Help the climate, change your diet: A cross-sectional study on how to involve consumers in a transition to a low-carbon society.
        Appetite. 2016; 98: 19-27
        • Rockett H.R.
        • Breitenbach M.
        • Frazier A.L.
        • et al.
        Validation of a youth/adolescent food frequency questionnaire.
        Prev Med. 1997; 26: 808-816
        • Bureau U.S.C.
        About the topic of race.
        United States Government, 2022
        • USDA
        Food Security in the US Survey Tools. Vol 2022.
        U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, 2022
        • Sanchez-Sabate R.
        • Badilla-Briones Y.
        • Sabate J.
        Understanding attitudes towards reducing meat consumption for environmental reasons: A qualitative synthesis review.
        Sustainability. 2019; 11: 6295
        • Leiserowitz A.
        • Ballew M.
        • Rosenthal S.
        • Seamaan J.
        Climate Change and the American Diet.
        Yale University and Earth Day Network, New Haven, CT2020
        • Wynes S.
        • Nicholas K.A.
        The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions.
        Environ Res Letters. 2017; 12074024
        • Willits-Smith A.
        • Aranda R.
        • Heller M.C.
        • Rose D.
        Addressing the carbon footprint, healthfulness, and costs of self-selected diets in the USA: A population-based cross-sectional study.
        The Lancet Planetary Health. 2020; 4: e98-e106
        • Hekler E.B.
        • Gardner C.D.
        • Robinson T.N.
        Effects of a college course about food and society on students’ eating behaviors.
        Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38: 543-547
        • Malan H.
        • Amsler Challamel G.
        • Silverstein D.
        • et al.
        Impact of a scalable, multi-campus “Foodprint” seminar on college students’ dietary intake and dietary carbon footprint.
        Nutrients. 2020; 12: 2890
        • Qian F.
        • Riddle M.C.
        • Wylie-Rosett J.
        • Hu F.B.
        Red and processed meats and health risks: How strong is the evidence?.
        Diabetes Care. 2020; 43: 265-271
        • Liu A.G.
        • Ford N.A.
        • Hu F.B.
        • Zelman K.M.
        • Mozaffarian D.
        • Kris-Etherton P.M.
        A healthy approach to dietary fats: Understanding the science and taking action to reduce consumer confusion.
        Nutr J. 2017; 16: 1-15
        • Basile A.
        Popularity of commercial and non-commercial diets from 2010–2020: A Google trends analysis.
        Curr Dev Nutr. 2021; 5 (391-391)
        • Neff R.A.
        • Edwards D.
        • Palmer A.
        • Ramsing R.
        • Righter A.
        • Wolfson J.
        Reducing meat consumption in the USA: A nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours.
        Public Health Nutr. 2018; 21: 1835-1844
        • Rothgerber H.
        Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption.
        Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2013; 14: 363
        • De Backer C.
        • Erreygers S.
        • De Cort C.
        • et al.
        Meat and masculinities: Can differences in masculinity predict meat consumption, intentions to reduce meat and attitudes towards vegetarians?.
        Appetite. 2020; 147104559
        • Burt K.G.
        • Fera J.
        • Lewin-Zwerdling A.
        Differences in US adults’ value of and preferences for sustainable food by race/ethnicity, income, and education.
        J Hunger Environment Nutr. 2021; 16: 321-335
        • Zeng L.
        • Ruan M.
        • Liu J.
        • et al.
        Trends in processed meat, unprocessed red meat, poultry, and fish consumption in the United States, 1999-2016.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019; 119: 1085-1098
        • Song H.
        • Lewis Jr., N.A.
        • Ballew M.T.
        • et al.
        What counts as an “environmental” issue? Differences in issue conceptualization by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
        J Environ Psychol. 2020; 68101404
        • Darmon N.
        • Drewnowski A.
        Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: A systematic review and analysis.
        Nutr Rev. 2015; 73: 643-660
        • Pearson A.R.
        • Schuldt J.P.
        • Romero-Canyas R.
        • Ballew M.T.
        • Larson-Konar D.
        Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018; 115: 12429-12434
        • Lohmann P.M.
        • Gsottbauer E.
        • Doherty A.
        • Kontoleon A.
        Do carbon footprint labels promote climatarian diets? Evidence from a large-scale field experiment.
        J Environ Econ Manage. 2022; 114102693
        • Rivera C.J.
        • Savage C.
        Campuses as living labs for sustainability problem-solving: Trends, triumphs, and traps.
        J Environ Stud Sci. 2020; 10: 334-340
        • Lee K.M.
        • Dias G.M.
        • Boluk K.
        • et al.
        Toward a healthy and environmentally sustainable campus food environment: A scoping review of postsecondary food interventions.
        Adv Nutr. 2021; 12: 1996-2022
        • Kim H.
        • Caulfield L.E.
        • Rebholz C.M.
        • Ramsing R.
        • Nachman K.E.
        Trends in types of protein in US adolescents and children: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2010.
        PloS One. 2020; 15e0230686
        • Vesely S.
        • Klöckner C.A.
        Social desirability in environmental psychology research: Three meta-analyses.
        Front Psychol. 2020; 11: 1395
        • Kim H.
        • Rebholz C.M.
        • Caulfield L.E.
        • Ramsing R.
        • Nachman K.E.
        Trends in types of protein in US adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2010.
        Public Health Nutr. 2019; 22: 191-201

      Biography

      M. J. Slotnick is a research associate, Department of Nutritional Sciences, The University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI.

      Biography

      J. Falbe is an associate professor of nutrition and human development, Department of Human Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA.

      Biography

      J. F. W. Cohen is an associate professor, Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Merrimack College, North Andover, MA, and an adjunct associate professor, Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

      Biography

      Ashley N. Gearhardt is an associate professor, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

      Biography

      J. A. Wolfson is an assistant professor, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, and USA Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

      Biography

      C. W. Leung is an assistant professor, Department of Nutritional Sciences, The University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI.