Abstract
Background
Objective
Design
Participants/setting
Main outcome measures
Statistical analyses performed
Results
Conclusions
Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and DieteticsReferences
- Errors in the interpretation of dietary assessments.Am J Clin Nutr. 1997; 65: 1100S-1107S
- Structure of dietary measurement error: Results of the OPEN biomarker study.Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158: 14-16
- Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers.Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 174: 591-603
- Measurement errors in dietary assessment using self-reported 24-hour recalls in low-income countries and strategies for their prevention.Adv Nutr. 2017; 8: 980-991
- Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake.Am J Epidemiol. 2014; 180: 172-188
- Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for potassium and sodium intake.Am J Epidemiol. 2015; 181: 473-487
- Food Intake Recording Software System, version 4 (FIRSSt4): A self-completed 24-h dietary recall for children.J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014; 27: 66-71
- The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24): A resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112: 1134-1137
- Development of a UK online 24-h dietary assessment tool: myfood24.Nutrients. 2015; 7: 4016-4032
- Development of a web-based 24-h dietary recall for a French-Canadian population.Nutrients. 2016; 8: 724
- Iterative development of an online dietary recall tool: INTAKE24.Nutrients. 2017; 9: 118
- Digital food photography: Dietary surveillance and beyond.Proc Food Sci. 2013; 2: 122-128
- Validity of portion-size measurement aids: A review.J Am Diet Assoc. 1997; 97: 289-292
- Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall.J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110: 55-64
- Food photography I: The perception of food portion size from photographs.Br J Nutr. 1994; 72: 649-663
- Portion size estimation in dietary assessment: A systematic review of existing tools, their strengths and limitations.Nutr Rev. 2020; 78: 885-900
- Portion size estimation and expectation of accuracy.J Food Compost Anal. 2006; 19: S14-S21
- An evaluation of food photographs as a tool for quantifying food and nutrient intakes.Public Health Nutr. 2000; 3: 183-192
- Development and evaluation of image-series for portion size estimation in dietary assessment among adults.J Nutr Sci. 2021; 10: e3
- Dietary assessment in minority ethnic groups: A systematic review of instruments for portion-size estimation in the United Kingdom.Nutr Rev. 2017; 75: 188-213
- The use of digital images in 24-hour recalls may lead to less misestimation of portion size compared with traditional interviewer-administered recalls.J Nutr. 2016; 146: 2567-2573
- Best practices for conducting and interpreting studies to validate self-report dietary assessment methods.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019; 119: 1801-1816
- The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately estimates group total energy and nutrient intake.J Nutr. 2006; 136: 2594-2599
- A comparison of food portion size estimation by older adults, young adults and nutritionists.J Nutr Health Aging. 2018; 22: 230-236
- The provision of assistance does not substantially impact the accuracy of 24-hour dietary recalls completed using the automated self-administered 24-h Dietary Assessment Tool among women with low incomes.J Nutr. 2019; 149: 114-122
- Assistance for people of all ages.https://www.fns.usda.gov/program/assistance-people-all-agesDate accessed: July 22, 2021
- Performance of the automated self-administered 24-hour recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall.Am Jour Clin Nutr. 2014; 100: 233-240
- Validation of a new computerized technique for quantitating individual dietary intake: The Nutrition Evaluation Scale System (NESSy) vs the weighed food record.Am J Clin Nutr. 1990; 51: 477-484
- The Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program Policies.(Published 2015)https://nifa.usda.gov/sites/default/files/program/EFNEP%20Policy%20Document%202015%20Update%20P1.pdfDate accessed: July 22, 2021
- Behavioral risk factor surveillance system.(Published 2014)https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/about/index.htmDate accessed: July 22, 2021
- Body mass index (BMI).(Published 2021)https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/index.htmlDate accessed: July 22, 2021
- Version 9.4. SAS Institute, 2013
- Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.https://www.fns.usda.gov/wicDate accessed: July 22, 2021
- Analysis of Health Surveys.John Wiley & Sons, 2011
- Lessons from studies to evaluate an online 24-hour recall for use with children and adults in Canada.Nutrients. 2017; 9: 100
Biography
Biography
Biography
Biography
Biography
Biography
Biography
Biography
Biography
Biography
Biography
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
FUNDING/SUPPORT Data collection was funded by a grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2015-09151). The current analyses were supported by the National Cancer Institute. At the time the initial analyses were conducted, S. I. Kirkpatrick was supported by a Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (CCSRI) Capacity Development Award (Grant 702855) and M. Marcinow was supported by funding from Alberta’s Tomorrow Project and the aforementioned CCSRI award.