Advertisement

Nutrition Care Process Quality Evaluation and Standardization Tool: The Next Frontier in Quality Evaluation of Documentation

Published:August 02, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.07.004

      Abstract

      Documentation is essential for communicating care between credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners and other health care providers. A validated tool that can evaluate quality documentation of the Nutrition Care Process (NCP) encounter, including progress on outcomes is lacking. The aim of the NCP Quality Evaluation and Standardization Tool (QUEST) validation study is to revise an existing NCP audit tool and evaluate it when used within US Veterans Affairs in all clinical care settings. Six registered dietitian nutritionists revised an existing NCP audit tool. The revised tool (NCP-QUEST) was analyzed for clarity, relevance, and reliability. Eighty-five documentation notes (44 initial, 41 reassessment) were received from eight volunteer Veterans Affairs sites. Five of six registered dietitian nutritionists participated in the interrater reliability testing blinded to each other's ratings; and two registered dietitian nutritionists participated in intrarater reliability reviewing the same notes 6 weeks later blinded to the original ratings. Results showed moderate levels of agreement in interrater reliability (Krippendorff’s α = .62 for all items, .66 for total score, and .52 for quality category rating). Intrarater reliability was excellent for all items (α = .86 to .87 for all items; .91 to .94 for total score and.74 to .89 for quality category rating). The NCP-QUEST has high content validity (Content Validity Index = 0.78 for item level, and 0.9 for scale level) after two cycles of content validity review. The tool can facilitate critical thinking, improved linking of NCP chains, and is a necessary foundation for quality data collection and outcomes management. The NCP-QUEST tool can improve accuracy and confidence in charting.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lacey K.
        • Pritchett E.
        Nutrition Care Process and Model: ADA adopts road map to quality care and outcomes management.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2003; 103: 1061-1072
        • Lacey K.
        • Cross N.
        A problem-based nutrition care model that is diagnostic driven and allows for monitoring and managing outcomes.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102: 578-589
        • Swan W.I.
        • Vivanti A.
        • Hakel-Smith N.A.
        • et al.
        Nutrition Care Process and Model Update: toward realizing people-centered care and outcomes management.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017; 117: 2003-2014
        • Hakel-Smith N.
        • Lewis N.M.
        A standardized nutrition care process and language are essential components of a conceptual model to guide and document nutrition care and patient outcomes.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2004; 104: 1878-1884
        • Murphy W.J.
        • Yadrick M.M.
        • Steiber A.L.
        • Mohan V.
        • Papoutsakis C.
        Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Health Informatics Infrastructure (ANDHII): a pilot study on the documentation of the Nutrition Care Process and the usability of ANDHII by registered dietitian nutritionists.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018; 118: 1966-1974
        • Hakel-Smith N.
        • Lewis N.M.
        • Eskridge K.M.
        Orientation to nutrition care process standards improves nutrition care documentation by nutrition practitioners.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2005; 105: 1582-1589
        • Lövestam E.O.Y.
        • Koochek A.
        • Karlström B.
        • Andersson A.
        Evaluation of a Nutrition Care Process-based audit instrument, the Diet-NCP-Audit, for documentation of dietetic care in medical records.
        Scand J Caring Sci. 2014; 28: 390-397
        • The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
        Nutrition Care Process: the next level.
        (Published 2021. Accessed March 21, 2021)
      1. Lewis SL, Wright L, Arikawa AY, Papoutsakis C. Etiology intervention link predicts resolution of nutrition diagnosis: a Nutrition Care Process outcomes study from a veterans' health care facility. J Acad Nutr Diet. July 27, 2020 [Epub ahead of print].

        • Chui T.K.
        • Proano G.V.
        • Raynor H.A.
        • Papoutsakis C.
        A Nutrition Care Process Audit of the National Quality Improvement Dataset: supporting the improvement of data quality using the ANDHII platform.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020; 120: 1238-1248.e1
      2. SPSS [computer program]. Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM SPSS Inc; 2019.

        • Yarnold P.R.
        ODA vs. π and κ: paradoxes of kappa.
        Optimal Data Analysis. 2016; 5: 160-161
        • Koo T.K.
        • Li M.Y.A.
        Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.
        J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-163
        • Portney L.G.
        • Watkins M.P.
        Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Vol. 892. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ2009
        • Papoutsakis C.
        • Moloney L.
        • Sinley R.C.
        • Acosta A.
        • Handu D.
        • Steiber A.L.
        Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics methodology for developing evidence-based nutrition practice guidelines.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017; 117: 794-804
        • Swan W.I.
        • Pertel D.G.
        • Hotson B.
        • et al.
        Nutrition Care Process (NCP) update part 2: developing and using the NCP terminology to demonstrate efficacy of nutrition care and related outcomes.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019; 119: 840-855
      3. Murphy WJ, Hand RK, Abram JK, Papoutsakis C. Impact of diabetes prevention guideline adoption on health outcomes: a pragmatic implementation trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. December 3, 2020 [Epub ahead of print].

        • Fulton J.
        • Lyon B.
        • Goudreau K.
        Chapter 5: clinical reasoning model: a clinical inquiry guide for solving problems in the nursing Domain.
        in: Foundations of Clinical Nurse Specialist Practice, 2 edition. 2nd ed. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY2014
        • Fulton J.
        • Lyon B.
        • Goudreau K.
        Chapter 7: evaluating interventions.
        in: Foundations of Clinical Nurse Specialist Practice, 2 ed. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY2014
        • Porter M.E.
        • Larsson S.
        • Lee T.H.
        Standardizing patient outcomes measurement.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 504-506
        • Schweiss S.
        • Pavelka A.
        • Garza O.W.
        • Moon J.Y.
        Using a multisite and multi-health system pharmacy resident program model for care documentation quality improvement.
        J Am Pharm Assoc. 2019; 59: 862-866.e861
        • Milchak J.L.
        • Shanahan R.L.
        • Kerzee J.A.
        Implementation of a peer review process to improve documentation consistency of care process indicators in the EMR in a primary care setting.
        J Managed Care Pharm. 2012; 18: 46-53
        • Hayter K.L.
        • Schaper A.M.
        Improving pain documentation with peer chart review.
        Nursing. 2015; 45: 58-63
        • Edwards M.T.
        In pursuit of quality and safety: an 8-year study of clinical peer review best practices in US hospitals.
        Intl J Qual Health Care. 2018; 30: 602-607
        • Department of Veteran Affairs
        Veterans Health Administration. VHA Directive 1438 clinical nutrition management and therapy.
      4. Lovestam E, Vivanti A, Steiber A, et al. Barriers and enablers in the implementation of a standardised process for nutrition care: findings from a multinational survey of dietetic professionals in 10 countries. J Hum Nutr Diet. January 7, 2020 [Epub ahead of print].

        • William H.
        • Yeaton
        • Sechrest Lee
        Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: strength, integrity, and effectiveness.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981; 19: 156-167

      Biography

      S. Lewis is director of the Anne Brezina Dietetics Internship Program, James A. Haley VA Hospital, Tampa, FL.

      Biography

      L. Miranda is a certified diabetes care and education specialist and advanced practice nutrition consultant, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA.

      Biography

      J. Kurtz is a certified diabetes educator and chief, nutrition, hospitality, & food service, Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ.

      Biography

      Linda Larison is a retired dietitian, Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

      Biography

      W. J. Brewer is chair, Nutrition and Food Advisory Board (VHA Central Office), and chief, nutrition and food service, Aleda E. Lutz VAMC, Saginaw, MI.

      Biography

      C. Papoutsakis is senior director, data science center, research, international and scientific affairs, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, IL.