Advertisement
Research Original Research| Volume 121, ISSUE 11, P2201-2209.e14, November 2021

Download started.

Ok

Favorable Commercial and Health Behavior Impacts of a Healthy Vending Policy at an Australian University

  • Author Footnotes
    ∗ APD = Accredited Practicing Dietitian (certified in Australia).
    Miranda R. Blake
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Miranda R. Blake, PhD, Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC, Australia, 3125.
    Footnotes
    ∗ APD = Accredited Practicing Dietitian (certified in Australia).
    Affiliations
    Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Anna Peeters
    Affiliations
    Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia

    Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Chris Livaditis
    Affiliations
    Campus Services Division Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Adrian J. Cameron
    Affiliations
    Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    ∗ APD = Accredited Practicing Dietitian (certified in Australia).

      Abstract

      Background

      The World Health Organization recognizes universities as an important health-promotion setting, including in healthy food provision. Previous research shows that healthy food retail interventions also need to consider commercial sustainability, including financial outcomes, and should take a holistic approach to consumer experience.

      Objective

      Our aim was to determine the health behavior and commercial outcomes of a multicomponent traffic light–based healthy vending policy implemented as one part of a holistic university food policy. The hypothesis was that purchases of less healthy “red” beverages would decrease compared with predicted sales, that purchases of healthier “green” and “amber” alternatives would increase, and that there would be no change in revenue.

      Design

      A quasi-experimental design evaluated a real-world food policy using monthly aggregated sales data to compare pre-intervention (January 2016 to March 2018) and post-intervention period sales (December 2018 to December 2019).

      Participants/setting

      Electronic sales data were collected from 51 beverage vending machines across 4 university campuses in Victoria, Australia.

      Intervention

      A multicomponent policy was implemented between April and November 2018. Beverages were classified using a voluntary state government traffic light framework. Policy included display ≤20% red beverages and ≥50% green beverages; machine traffic light labeling; health-promoting machine branding; review of machine placement; and recycled bottle packaging.

      Main outcome measures

      Changes in red, amber, and green volume sales, and revenue compared with predicated sales.

      Statistical analyses performed

      Interrupted time series analysis of sales data compared post-policy sales with predicted sales.

      Results

      In the 13th month post-policy implementation, there was a 93.2% (95% CI +35.9% to +150.5%) increase in total beverage volume sold and an 88.6% (95% CI +39.2% to +138.1%) increase in revenue. There was no change in red beverage volume sold, but increases in green (+120.8%; 95% CI +59.0% to +182.6%) and amber (+223.2%; 95% CI +122.4% to +323.9%) volume sold.

      Conclusions

      Sustained behavior change and commercial outcomes suggest that holistic vending interventions can effectively promote healthier beverage sales.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Tsouros A.D.
        • Dowding G.
        • Dooris M.
        Strategic framework for the Health Promoting Universities project.
        in: Tsouros A. Dowding G. Thompson J. Dooris M. World Health Organization Health Promoting Universities: Concept, Experience and Framework for Action. WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1998: 121-137
        • Grech A.
        • Hebden L.
        • Roy R.
        • Allman-Farinelli M.
        Are products sold in university vending machines nutritionally poor? A food environment audit.
        Nutr Diet. 2017; 74: 185-190
        • Horacek T.M.
        • Erdman M.B.
        • Byrd-Bredbenner C.
        • et al.
        Assessment of the dining environment on and near the campuses of fifteen post-secondary institutions.
        Public Health Nutr. 2013; 16: 1186-1196
        • Roy R.
        • Hebden L.
        • Kelly B.
        • et al.
        Description, measurement and evaluation of tertiary-education food environments.
        Br J Nutr. 2016; 115: 1598-1606
        • Roy R.
        • Soo D.
        • Conroy D.
        • Wall C.R.
        • Swinburn B.
        Exploring university food environment and on-campus food purchasing behaviors, preferences, and opinions.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019; 51: 865-875
        • Roy R.
        • Kelly B.
        • Rangan A.
        • Allman-Farinelli M.
        Food environment interventions to improve the dietary behavior of young adults in tertiary education settings: A systematic literature review.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; 115: 1647-1681.e1641
        • Berman E.R.
        • Johnson R.K.
        The unintended consequences of changes in beverage options and the removal of bottled water on a university campus.
        Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: 1404-1408
        • Whatnall M.C.
        • Patterson A.J.
        • Hutchesson M.J.
        Effectiveness of nutrition interventions in vending machines to encourage the purchase and consumption of healthier food and drinks in the university setting: A systematic review.
        Nutrients. 2020; 12: 876
        • Grech A.
        • Allman-Farinelli M.
        A systematic literature review of nutrition interventions in vending machines that encourage consumers to make healthier choices.
        Obes Rev. 2015; 16: 1030-1041
        • Blake M.R.
        • Backholer K.
        • Lancsar E.
        • et al.
        Investigating business outcomes of healthy food retail strategies: A systematic scoping review.
        Obes Rev. 2019; 20: 1384-1399
      1. Euromonitor International. Vending in World—Datagraphics. Euromonitor; April 2020.

      2. Euromonitor International. Vending in Australia—Analysis. Euromonitor; March 2020.

        • Tam R.
        • Yassa B.
        • Parker H.
        • O'Connor H.
        • Allman-Farinelli M.
        University students' on-campus food purchasing behaviors, preferences, and opinions on food availability.
        Nutrition. 2017; 37: 7-13
        • Sowers M.F.
        • Colby S.
        • Kavanagh K.
        • Zhou W.
        Testing product, pricing, and promotional strategies for vending machine interventions with a college population.
        J Foodserv Bus Res. 2019; 22: 303-325
        • Carrad A.M.
        • Louie J.C.Y.
        • Milosavljevic M.
        • Kelly B.
        • Flood V.M.
        Consumer support for healthy food and drink vending machines in public places.
        Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015; 39: 355-357
        • Deakin University
        Deakin at a Glance 2018.
        Deakin University, 2018
      3. Food charter. Deakin University.
        (Published 2020. Accessed April 16, 2020)
      4. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy Choices: Food and Drink Classification Guide. 2015, Victorian Government; Melbourne, Victoria.

      5. Australian Dietary Guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council.
        (Published 2013. Accessed April 28, 2021)
        • Healthy Eating Advisory Service
        FoodChecker. State of Victoria.
        (Published 2016. Accessed April 16, 2020)
      6. FoodSwitch. The George Institute for Global Health.
        (Published 2020. Accessed April 16, 2020)
        • Health Star Rating System
        Calculator and artwork. Australian Department of Health.
        (Published 2019. Updated 25 Jun 2019. Accessed April 16, 2020)
        • World Health Organization
        Sugars Intake for Adults and Children: Guideline.
        World Health Organization, 2015
        • Food Standards, Australia, New Zealand
        AUSNUT 2011–13—Australian food Composition Database.
        Food Standards, Australia, New Zealand, Canberra2014
        • Wagner A.K.
        • Soumerai S.B.
        • Zhang F.
        • Ross-Degnan D.
        Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research.
        J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002; 27: 299-309
      7. Stata [computer program]. Version 16. Stata Corp, 2019
      8. Climate data online. Australian Bureau of Meteorology.
        (Published 2021. Accessed March 23, 2021)
        • Linden A.
        Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single-and multiple-group comparisons.
        Stata J. 2015; 15: 480-500
        • Rosi A.
        • Zerbini C.
        • Pellegrini N.
        • Scazzina F.
        • Brighenti F.
        • Lugli G.
        How to improve food choices through vending machines: The importance of healthy food availability and consumers’ awareness.
        Food Qual Prefer. 2017; 62: 262-269
        • Cecchini M.
        • Warin L.
        Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.
        Obes Rev. 2016; 17: 201-210
        • Hollands G.J.
        • Carter P.
        • Anwer S.
        • et al.
        Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 9: CD012573
        • Hua S.V.
        • Ickovics J.R.
        Vending machines: A narrative review of factors influencing items purchased.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116: 1578-1588
      9. Hitting the books: Characteristics of higher education students. Australian Bureau of Statistics.
        (Published 2014. Updated March 4, 2014. Accessed April 28, 2020)

      Biography

      M. R. Blake is a research fellow, Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

      Biography

      A. Peeters is director of the Institute for Health Transformation, and a director of the Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

      Biography

      C. Livaditis is Hospitality Manager, Campus Services Division Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

      Biography

      A. J. Cameron is an associate professor, Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.