The Use of Charitable Food Assistance Among Low-Income Households in the United States

Published:September 18, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2020.07.026

      Abstract

      Background

      About 11% of US households are food insecure, and many of those households seek charitable food assistance (CFA). However, little is understood about the nutritional composition of the diets of households receiving CFA, or the relationship between CFA and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) usage among low-income households.

      Objective

      The aim of the study was to compare the nutritional quality of foods obtained by CFA clients to those of similar nonclients. Furthermore, the study examined the timing of CFA use relative to the timing of SNAP use among CFA clients during the week.

      Design/participants

      Analyses were conducted using 2012 US Department of Agriculture National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS), which collected data for 4826 households’ food acquisitions during a 7-day survey week. Sixty-seven households reported using CFAs during the survey week.

      Main outcomes measure

      The nutritional quality of food was measured by the ratios between food acquisition quantities and the US Department of Agriculture Thrifty Food Plan consumption recommendations. The date of SNAP use was compared with that of CFA use for CFA clients who were also SNAP recipients.

      Statistical analyses performed

      Propensity score matching was utilized to construct a matching sample of CFA clients and nonclients. T tests were used to compare the means of variables.

      Results

      CFA clients were more likely to be food insecure (48% vs 28%, P < .001) and less likely to have access to a car (61.2% vs 84.8%, P < .001) than CFA nonclients. CFAs represent an important source of foods for CFA clients, taking up 28% of their total food at home acquisitions. CFA clients obtained more nonstarchy vegetables than matched nonclients. Furthermore, among the 45% of CFA clients who also participated in SNAP, the majority (52.4%) of them used SNAP benefits within 10 days of SNAP benefits distribution while most (67.9%) of those households used CFAs starting on day 11 or later after SNAP benefits were allocated.

      Conclusions

      CFAs provide a substantial portion of the diets of their clients and, in particular, for foods that constitute components of healthy diets. For the proportion of CFA clients who received SNAP, this study finds evidence that CFA clients relied more on CFAs when their SNAP benefits were likely to run low.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Coleman-Jensen A.
        • Rabbitt M.
        • Gregory C.
        • Singh A.
        Household food security in the United States in 2016.
        (USDA, Economic Research Report; No. ERR-256)2018
        • Gundersen C.
        • Kreider B.
        • Pepper J.
        The economics of food insecurity in the United States.
        Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2011; 33: 281-303
        • Gundersen C.
        • Ziliak J.
        Food insecurity and health outcomes.
        Health Aff. 2015; 34: 1830-1839
        • Gundersen C.
        • Dewey A.
        • Hake M.
        • Engelhard E.
        • Crumbaugh A.
        Food insecurity across the rural/urban divide: Are counties in need being reached by charitable food assistance?.
        Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2017; 672: 217-236
        • USDA Food and Nutrition Service
        SNAP data tables.
        • USDA Food and Nutrition Service
        Child nutrition tables.
        • USDA Food and Nutrition Service
        WIC data tables.
        https://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/wic-program
        Date accessed: April 27, 2019
        • Kreider B.
        • Pepper J.
        • Gundersen C.
        • Jolliffe D.
        Identifying the effects of SNAP (food stamps) on child health outcomes when participation is endogenous and misreported.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 2012; 107: 958-975
        • Gundersen C.
        • Kreider B.
        • Pepper J.
        The impact of the national school lunch program on child health: A nonparametric bounds analysis.
        J Econom. 2012; 166: 79-91
        • Kreder B.
        • Pepper J.
        • Roy M.
        Identifying the effects of WIC on food insecurity among infants and children.
        South Econ J. 2016; 82: 1106-1122
        • Feeding America
        2014. Hunger in America 2014 national report.
        • Thompson F.E.
        • Taren D.L.
        • Andersen E.
        • et al.
        Within month variability in use of soup kitchens in New York State.
        Am J Public Health. 1988; 78: 1298-1301
        • Rauschenbach B.S.
        • Frongillo E.A.
        • Thompson F.E.
        • Andersen E.J.Y.
        • Spicer D.A.
        Dependency on soup kitchens in urban areas of New York State.
        Am J Public Health. 1990; 80: 57-60
        • Duffy P.
        • Zizza C.
        • Jacoby J.
        • Tayie F.A.
        Diet quality is low among female food pantry clients in eastern Alabama.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009; 41: 414-419
        • Paynter S.
        • Berner M.
        • Anderson E.
        When even the “dollar value meal” costs too much: Food insecurity and long term dependence on food pantry assistance.
        Public Adm Q. 2011; 35: 26-58
        • Robaina K.A.
        • Martin K.S.
        Food insecurity, poor diet quality, and obesity among food pantry participants in Hartford, CT.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013; 45: 159-164
        • USDA Economic Research Service
        FoodAPS National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey.
        • Carlson A.
        • Lino M.
        • Juan W.
        • Hanson K.
        • Basiotis P.P.
        Thrifty food plan, 2006 (No. 42899).
        (USDA, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion)2007 (Accessed 5 September 2020)
        • Fan L.
        • Baylis K.
        • Gundersen C.
        • Ver Ploeg M.
        Does a nutritious diet cost more in food deserts?.
        Agric Econ. 2018; 49: 587-597
        • Wilde P.E.
        • Llobrera J.
        Using the thrifty food plan to assess the cost of a nutritious diet.
        J Consum Aff. 2009; 43: 274-304
        • Cassady D.
        • Jetter K.M.
        • Culp J.
        Is price a barrier to eating more fruits and vegetables for low-income families?.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107: 1909-1915
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Darmon N.
        Food choices and diet costs: an economic analysis.
        J Nutr. 2005; 135: 900-904
        • Emmons L.
        Relationship of participation in food assistance programs to the nutritional quality of diets.
        Am J Public Health. 1987; 77: 856-858
        • USDA Economic Research Service
        National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS) Codebook: Food-at-Home (FAH) Item Data—Public Use File.
        • USDA. National
        Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS): Nutrient Coding Overview.
        • Bickel G.
        • Nord M.
        • Price C.
        • Hamilton W.
        • Cook J.
        Guide to measuring household food security, revised 2000.
        (USDA, Food and Nutrition Service)2000 (Accessed 5 September 2020)
        • Linden A.
        • Adams J.L.
        Evaluating disease management programme effectiveness: An introduction to instrumental variables.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2006; 12: 148-154
        • Goldman D.P.
        • Bhattacharya J.
        • McCaffrey D.F.
        • Duan N.
        • Leibowitz A.A.
        • Joyce G.F.
        • Morton S.C.
        Effect of insurance on mortality in an HIV-positive population in care.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 2001; 96: 883-894
        • Rubin D.B.
        Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores.
        Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 757-763
        • Daponte B.O.
        • Lewis G.H.
        • Sanders S.
        • Taylor L.
        Food pantry use among low-income households in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
        J Nutr Educ. 1998; 30: 50-57
        • Greenberg M.
        • Greenberg G.
        • Mazza L.
        Food pantries, poverty, and social justice.
        Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 20-21
        • Tiehen L.
        Private Provision of Food Aid: The Emergency Food Assistance System.
        (USDA, Economic Research Service)2002 (Accessed 5 September 2020)
        • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation
        Healthy Food Bank Hub.
        • Ample Harvest
        Grow more feed more.
        AmpleHarvest.org
        Date accessed: January 19, 2019
      1. Farm to Food Bank.
        • Food Gatherers
        Plant a row for the hungry.
        • USDA Food and Nutrition Service
        The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) fact sheet.
        • Gundersen C.
        • Kreider B.
        • Pepper J.V.
        Reconstructing SNAP to more effectively alleviate food insecurity in the U.S.
        RSF. 2018; 4: 113-130
        • Ziliak J.
        Modernizing SNAP benefits.
        (The Hamilton Project, Policy Proposal 2016–06)2016 (Accessed 5 September 2020)
        • Coleman-Jensen A.
        • Rabbitt M.
        • Gregory C.
        • Singh A.
        Statistical supplement to household food security in the United States in 2015.
        2016 (USDA-ERS Economic Research Report. AP072) (Accessed 5 September 2020)

      Biography

      L. Fan is an assistant professor, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

      Biography

      C. Gundersen is a professor, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.

      Biography

      K. Baylis is a professor, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.

      Biography

      M. Saksena is an economist, Office of the Chief Economist, US Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.