Advertisement

School Lunch Entrées Before and After Implementation of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010

Published:November 23, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2018.09.009

      Abstract

      Background

      The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA) 2010 updated standards to increase the nutritional quality of school meals. Studies of HHFKA outcomes have focused primarily on fruit and vegetables, nutrient quality of whole meals, and plate waste.

      Objective

      To examine changes in school lunch entrée nutrient quality and student selections after HHFKA implementation.

      Design

      Descriptive, longitudinal study analyzing 1.7 million student-selected lunch entrées in eight entrée categories.

      Participants/setting

      Three middle schools and three high schools in an urban school district in Washington State, from January 2011 to January 2014 (16 months before and 15 months after HHFKA implementation).

      Main outcome measures

      Nutritional quality of each entrée category was assessed by analyzing mean adequacy ratio, energy density, and energy per serving. Selection was determined by analyzing number of entrées in each category selected by students.

      Statistical analyses performed

      Comparison of indices of pre- and postimplementation nutritional quality using a combination of Wilcoxon two-sample test with t approximation and a two-sided alternative t test assuming equal variances and t test assuming unequal variances using Satterthwaite approximation. Quantity of entrée categories selected was also determined by Satterthwaite approximation.

      Results

      After implementation, there was significant improvement in mean adequacy ratio and energy per serving overall for all entrées combined. There were significant improvements in both mean adequacy ratio and energy per serving for salads, burritos, and pizza in middle schools and for hot sandwiches and burritos in high schools. For energy density, middle schools also had significant decreases for casseroles and salads, with no significant changes found in high schools. The variety of entrées decreased by 44%, and there were significant changes in the proportions of entrées selected from specific food categories.

      Conclusion

      Nutritional quality of lunch entrées, variety of entrées available, and student entrée selections changed after implementation of HHFKA policy in one urban school district in Washington State.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. National School Lunch Program: Participation and Lunches Served. United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service website. https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/pd/slsummar.pdf. Updated July 7, 2017. Accessed July 10, 2017.

      2. National School Lunch Program: Fact Sheet. United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service website. http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/NSLPFactSheet.pdf. Published September 2013. Accessed March 1, 2017.

        • Oliveira V.
        The Food Assistance Landscape FY 2016 Annual Report, EIB-169. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2017: 1-20 (Accessed August 6, 2017)
        • Merlo C.
        • Brener N.
        • Kann L.
        • McManus T.
        • Harris D.
        • Mugavero K.
        School-level practices to increase availability of fruits, vegetables, and whole Grains, and reduce sodium in school meals - United States, 2000, 2006, and 2014.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015; 64: 905-908
      3. S.1614 - Healthy Meals for Healthy Americans Act of 1994. United States Congress website. https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-bill/1614. Published October 5, 1994. Updated November 2, 1994. Accessed April 2, 2017.

      4. Nutrition Standards and Meal Requirements for National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs: Phase I. Proposed Approach for Recommending Revisions. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Services website. https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/SchoolMealsIOMPhaseI.pdf. Published 2008. Accessed April 2, 2017.

      5. Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs, Final Rule.
        Fed Regist. 2012; 77: 4088-4167
      6. Confessore N. How school lunch became the latest political battleground. New York Times. October 7, 2014. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/magazine/how-school-lunch-became-the-latest-political-battleground.html. Accessed April 13, 2017.

      7. Ralston K, Newman C, Clauson A, Guthrie J, Buzby JC. The National School Lunch Program: Background, Trends, and Issues. United States Department of Agriculture. 2008;ERR-61:56. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED502404.pdf. Published July 2008. Accessed June 18, 2017.

      8. Healthier School Day: Tools for Schools: Focusing on Smart Snacks. United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service website. https://www.fns.usda.gov/healthierschoolday/tools-schools-focusing-smart-snacks. Updated March 27, 2017. Accessed June 1, 2017.

        • Weir K.
        • Sharma A.
        Child nutrition professionals’ feedback on implementing the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010.
        J Foodserv Bus Res. 2016; 19: 213-221
      9. HHFKA Implementation Research Brief: Student Participation. FNS USDA website. https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/ops/HHFKA-StudentParticipation.pdf. Published January 2016. Accessed March 25, 2018.

      10. School Meal Programs Innovate to Improve Student Nutrition. The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation website. http://www.pewtrusts.org/∼/media/assets/2016/12/school_meal_programs_innovate_to_improve_student_nutrition.pdf. Published December 2016. Accessed March 1, 2017.

        • Amin S.
        • Yon B.
        • Taylor J.
        • Johnson R.
        Impact of the National School Lunch Program on fruit and vegetable selection in northeastern elementary schoolchildren, 2012–2013.
        Public Health Rep. 2015; 130: 453-457
        • Au L.E.
        • Rosen N.L.
        • Fenton K.
        • Hecht K.
        • Ritchie L.D.
        Eating school lunch is associated with higher diet quality among elementary school students.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116: 1817-1824
        • Bergman E.A.
        • Englund T.
        • Taylor K.W.
        • Watkins T.
        • Schepman S.
        • Rushing K.
        School lunch before and after implementation of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act.
        J Child Nutr Manag. 2014; 38
        • Byker C.J.
        • Farris A.R.
        • Marcenelle M.
        • Davis G.C.
        • Serrano E.L.
        Food waste in a school nutrition program after implementation of new lunch program guidelines.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: 406-411
        • Cohen J.F.W.
        • Richardson S.
        • Austin S.B.
        • Economos C.D.
        • Rimm E.B.
        School lunch waste among middle school students: Nutrients consumed and costs.
        Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44: 114-121
        • Cohen J.F.W.
        • Richardson S.
        • Parker E.
        • Catalano P.J.
        • Rimm E.B.
        Impact of the new U.S. Department of Agriculture school meal standards on food selection, consumption, and waste.
        Am J Prev Med. 2014; 46: 388-394
        • Connors P.
        • Bednar C.
        Middle school cafeteria food choice and waste prior to implementation of Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act changes in the National School Lunch Program.
        J Child Nutr Manag. 2015; 39
        • Cullen K.W.
        • Chen T.Z.
        • Dave J.M.
        Changes in foods selected and consumed after implementation of the new National School Lunch Program meal patterns in southeast Texas.
        Prev Med Reports. 2015; 2: 440-443
        • Cullen K.W.
        • Chen T.Z.
        • Dave J.M.
        • Jensen H.
        Differential improvements in student fruit and vegetable selection and consumption in response to the new National School Lunch Program regulations: A pilot study.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; 115: 743-750
        • Gase L.N.
        • McCarthy W.J.
        • Robles B.
        • Kuo T.
        Student receptivity to new school meal offerings: Assessing fruit and vegetable waste among middle school students in the Los Angeles Unified School District.
        Prev Med. 2014; 67: S28-S33
        • Ishdorj A.
        • Capps O.
        • Storey M.
        • Murano P.
        Investigating the relationship between food pairings and plate waste from elementary school lunches.
        Food Nutr Sci. 2015; 6: 1029-1044
        • Schwartz M.B.
        • Henderson K.E.
        • Read M.
        • Danna N.
        • Ickovics J.R.
        New school meal regulations increase fruit consumption and do not increase total plate waste.
        Child Obes. 2015; 11: 242-247
        • Smith K.
        • Bergman E.A.
        • Englund T.
        • Ogan D.
        • Barbee M.
        School lunch quality following Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act implementation.
        J Child Nutr Manag. 2016; 40 (R)
        • Smith S.
        • Cunningham-Sabo L.
        Food choice, plate waste and nutrient intake of elementary- and middle-school students participating in the US National School Lunch Program.
        Public Health Nutr. 2014; 17: 1255-1263
        • Taber D.
        • Chriqui J.
        • Powell L.
        • Chaloupka F.
        Association between state laws governing school meal nutrition content and student weight status: Implications for new USDA school meal standards.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167: 513-519
        • Terry-McElrath Y.M.
        • O’Malley P.M.
        • Johnston L.D.
        Foods and beverages offered in US public secondary schools through the National School Lunch Program from 2011–2013: Early evidence of improved nutrition and reduced disparities.
        Prev Med. 2015; 78: 52-58
        • Turner L.
        • Ohri-Vachaspati P.
        • Powell L.
        • Chaloupka F.
        Improvements and disparities in types of foods and milk beverages offered in elementary school lunches, 2006-2007 to 2013-2014.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2016; 13: E39
        • Johnson D.
        • Podrabsky M.
        • Rocha A.
        • Otten J.
        Effect of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act on the nutritional quality of meals selected by students and school lunch participation rates.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2016; 170: E153918
      11. NUTRIKIDS [computer program]. Version 14.0. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc, Rochester, NY2012
      12. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Part D. Chapter 1: Food and Nutrient Intakes, and Health: Current Status and Trends: Nutrient Intake and Nutrients of Concern. United States Department of Agriculture Food and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/06-chapter-1/d1-2.asp. Updated April 3, 2018. Accessed April 3, 2018.

        • Kranz S.
        • Mitchell D.C.
        • Siega-Riz A.M.
        • Smiciklas-Wright H.
        Dietary fiber intake by American preschoolers is associated with more nutrient-dense diets.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2005; 105: 221-225
        • Roberts S.B.
        • Heyman M.B.
        Micronutrient shortfalls in young children’s diets: Common and owing to inadequate intakes both at home and at child care centers.
        Nutr Rev. 2000; 58: 27-29
        • Suskind D.L.
        Nutritional deficiencies during normal growth.
        Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009; 56: 1035-1053
      13. Protein in Diet. United States National Library of Medicine, Medline Plus website. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002467.htm. Updated May 7, 2017. Accessed April 9, 2018.

      14. Guidance for Industry: A Food Labeling Guide (14. Appendix F: Calculate the Percent Daily Value for the Appropriate Nutrients). United States Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm064928.htm. Published January 2013. Updated August 2015. Accessed April 14, 2017.

      15. SAS [computer program]. Version 9.4 TS Level 1M3. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC2002-2012
        • Spruance L.
        • Myers L.
        • O’Malley K.
        • Rose D.
        • Johnson C.
        Individual- and school-level factors related to school-based salad bar use among children and adolescents.
        Health Educ Behav. 2017; 44: 885-897
        • Healthy Eating Index (HEI)
        United States Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion website.
        (Accessed April 9, 2018)
        • Ogata B.N.
        • Hayes D.
        Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutrition guidance for healthy children ages 2 to 11 years.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014; 114: 1257-1276

      Biography

      L. Mozer is a clinical pediatric dietitian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; at the time of the study, she was a graduate student, University of Washington, Nutritional Sciences Program, Seattle.

      Biography

      D. B. Johnson is a professor emeritus, University of Washington, Nutritional Sciences Program, Seattle.

      Biography

      M. Podrabsky is the director of school and community initiatives, University of Washington, Center for Public Health Nutrition, and a clinical instructor, Nutritional Sciences Program, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle.

      Biography

      A. Rocha is a data manager and research analyst, Seattle Minimum Wage Project, Seattle, WA; at the time of the study, she was a statistical programmer and data manager, University of Washington, Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, Seattle.