Advertisement

Nutrition and Cancer Research: Resources for the Nutrition and Dietetics Practitioner

Published:December 28, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.011
      This issue focuses on issues in the intersection of nutrition science and cancer prevention research. In this commentary, we provide a high-level orientation for readers to nutrition and cancer. We begin by reviewing the burden of cancer, which has necessitated public policy recommending improvements to diet for the prevention of cancer in the United States, although this is true of many other countries as well. These policy recommendations are based on a critical review of scientific evidence linking diet and cancer. We then discuss the inconsistencies in the nutrition–cancer scientific literature and the subsequent issues registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) face when translating this literature in clinic settings. We conclude with some resources for practitioners and general guidance.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Torre L.A.
        • Bray F.
        • Siegel R.L.
        • et al.
        Global cancer statistics, 2012.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65: 87-108
      1. Cancer facts & figures 2017. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/cancer-facts-and-figures-2017.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2017.

        • Arteaga C.L.
        • Adamson P.C.
        • Engelman J.A.
        • et al.
        AACR cancer progress report 2014.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20: S1-S11
        • McCullough M.L.
        • Patel A.V.
        • Kushi L.H.
        • et al.
        Following cancer prevention guidelines reduces risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20: 1089-1097
        • Harvey A.E.
        • Lashinger L.M.
        • Hursting S.D.
        The growing challenge of obesity and cancer: An inflammatory issue.
        Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011; 1229: 45-52
      2. US Department of Health and Human Services and the US Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/. Accessed February 2, 2017.

        • Keum N.
        • Greenwood D.C.
        • Lee D.H.
        • et al.
        Adult weight gain and adiposity-related cancers: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107 (pii: djv088)
        • Kensler T.W.
        • Roebuck B.D.
        • Wogan G.N.
        • et al.
        Aflatoxin: A 50-year odyssey of mechanistic and translational toxicology.
        Toxicol Sci. 2011; 120: S28-S48
        • Klil-Drori A.J.
        • Azoulay L.
        • Pollak M.N.
        Cancer, obesity, diabetes, and antidiabetic drugs: Is the fog clearing?.
        Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017; 14: 85-99
        • World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research
        Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective.
        American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DC2007
      3. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project (CUP). http://www.wcrf.org/int/research-we-fund/continuous-update-project-cup. Accessed January 23, 2017.

        • Godos J.
        • Bella F.
        • Sciacca S.
        Vegetarianism and breast, colorectal and prostate cancer risk: An overview and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
        J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016; 30: 349-359
        • Markozannes G.
        • Tzoulaki I.
        • Karli D.
        • et al.
        Diet, body size, physical activity and risk of prostate cancer: An umbrella review of the evidence.
        Eur J Cancer. 2016; 69: 61-69
        • World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research
        Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective.
        American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DC1997
        • Tamimi R.M.
        • Spiegelman D.
        • Smith-Warner S.A.
        • et al.
        Population attributable risk of modifiable and nonmodifiable breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal breast cancer.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2016; 184: 884-893
        • Norat T.
        • Aune D.
        • Chan D.
        • et al.
        Fruits and vegetables: Updating the epidemiologic evidence for the WCRF/AICR lifestyle recommendations for cancer prevention.
        Cancer Treat Res. 2014; 159: 35-50
        • Vergnaud A.C.
        • Romaguera D.
        • Peeters P.H.
        • et al.
        Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines and risk of death in Europe: Results from the European Prospective Investigation into Nutrition and Cancer Cohort Study.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 97: 1107-1120
        • Barnes B.B.
        • Steindorf K.
        • Hein R.
        • et al.
        Population attributable risk of invasive postmenopausal breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes for modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors.
        Cancer Epidemiol. 2011; 35: 345-352
        • Johnson C.M.
        • Wei C.
        • Ensor J.E.
        • et al.
        Meta-analyses of colorectal cancer risk factors.
        Cancer Causes Control. 2013; 24: 1207-1222
        • Murphy N.
        • Norat T.
        • Ferrari P.
        • et al.
        Dietary fibre intake and risks of cancers of the colon and rectum in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC).
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e39361
        • Frampton M.
        • Houlston R.S.
        Modeling the prevention of colorectal cancer from the combined impact of host and behavioral risk factors.
        Genet Med. 2017; 19: 314-321
        • Aune D.
        • Chan D.S.
        • Lau R.
        • et al.
        Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d6617
        • Sorkin B.C.
        • Kuszak A.J.
        • Williamson J.S.
        • et al.
        The challenge of reproducibility and accuracy in nutrition research: Resources and pitfalls.
        Adv Nutr. 2016; 7: 383-389
        • Kipnis V.
        • Subar A.F.
        • Midthune D.
        • et al.
        Structure of dietary measurement error: Results of the OPEN biomarker study.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158: 14-21
        • Thompson F.E.
        • Kirkpatrick S.I.
        • Subar A.F.
        • et al.
        The National Cancer Institute's dietary assessment primer: A resource for diet research.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; 115: 1986-1995
        • Mayne S.T.
        • Playdon M.C.
        • Rock C.L.
        Diet, nutrition, and cancer: Past, present and future.
        Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016; 13: 504-515
        • Burns P.B.
        • Rohrich R.J.
        • Chung K.C.
        The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 305-310
        • Collins F.S.
        • Tabak L.A.
        Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.
        Nature. 2014; 505: 612-613
      4. National Institutes of Health. Rigor and reproducibility. https://www.nih.gov/research-training/rigor-reproducibility. Accessed January 23, 2017.

        • Lampe J.W.
        • Navarro S.L.
        • Hullar M.A.J.
        • et al.
        Inter-individual differences in response to dietary intervention: Integrating omics platforms towards personalised dietary recommendations.
        Proc Nutr Soc. 2013; 72: 207-218
        • Wactawski-Wende J.
        • Kotchen J.M.
        • Anderson G.L.
        • et al.
        Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of colorectal cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 684-696
        • Omenn G.S.
        • Goodman G.E.
        • Thornquist M.D.
        • et al.
        Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1150-1155
        • Harris W.S.
        • Mozaffarian D.
        • Lefevre M.
        • et al.
        Towards establishing dietary reference intakes for eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids.
        J Nutr. 2009; 139: 804S-819S
        • de Jong M.
        • Maina T.
        Of mice and humans: Are they the same? Implications in cancer translational research.
        J Nucl Med. 2010; 51: 501-504
        • Academy Quality Management Committee and Scope of Practice Subcommittee of Quality Management Committee
        Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2012 standards of practice in nutrition care and standards of professional performance for registered dietitians.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: S29-S45
        • Cairns R.A.
        • Harris I.S.
        • Mak T.W.
        Regulation of cancer cell metabolism.
        Nat Rev Cancer. 2011; 11: 85-95
        • Romaguera D.
        • Vergnaud A.C.
        • Peeters P.H.
        • et al.
        Is concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines for cancer prevention related to subsequent risk of cancer? Results from the EPIC study.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 96: 150-163
        • Kushi L.H.
        • Doyle C.
        • McCullough M.
        • et al.
        American Cancer Society Guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: Reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62: 30-67
        • Kabat G.C.
        • Matthews C.E.
        • Kamensky V.
        • et al.
        Adherence to cancer prevention guidelines and cancer incidence, cancer mortality, and total mortality: A prospective cohort study.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2015; 101: 558-569
        • Thomson C.A.
        • McCullough M.L.
        • Wertheim B.C.
        • et al.
        Nutrition and physical activity cancer prevention guidelines, cancer risk, and mortality in the Women's Health Initiative.
        Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014; 7: 42-53
      5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines version 2.2016: Healthy lifestyles. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/survivorship.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2017.

        • Denlinger C.S.
        • Ligibel J.A.
        • Are M.
        • et al.
        Survivorship: Nutrition and weight management, version 2.2014. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014; 12: 1396-1406
        • Rock C.L.
        • Doyle C.
        • Demark-Wahnefried W.
        • et al.
        Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62: 243-274
        • Oncology Nutrition Dietetic Practice Group
        Oncology Nutrition for Clinical Practice Oncology.
        1st ed. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, IL2013
      6. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence analysis library. https://www.andeal.org. Accessed June 16, 2017.

        • Monsen E.R.
        • Van Horn L.
        Research: Successful Approaches.
        3rd ed. American Dietetic Association, Chicago, IL2007
      7. National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health. NIA clinical research toolbox. https://www.nia.nih.gov/research/dgcg/clinical-research-study-investigators-toolbox. Accessed August 31, 2017.

      8. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health. NCCIH clinical research toolbox. https://nccih.nih.gov/grants/toolbox. Accessed August 31, 2017.

      9. National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health. Regulation of genetic tests. https://www.genome.gov/10002335/regulation-of-genetic-tests. Accessed June 7, 2017.

      10. American Medical Association. Genetic testing. https://www.ama-assn.org/content/genetic-testing. Accessed August 31, 2017.

        • Wolff A.C.
        • Hammond M.E.
        • Schwartz J.N.
        • et al.
        American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor testing in breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 118-125
        • Stuckey A.R.
        • Onstad M.A.
        Hereditary breast cancer: An update on risk assessment and genetic testing in 2015.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 161-165
      11. US Food and Drug Administration. List of cleared or approved companion diagnostic devices (in vitro and imaging tools). https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/InVitroDiagnostics/ucm301431.htm. Accessed September 5, 2017.

        • Daly J.
        • Willis K.
        • Small R.
        • et al.
        A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 43-49
        • Gugiu P.C.
        Hierarchy of evidence and appraisal of limitations (HEAL) grading system.
        Eval Program Plann. 2015; 48: 149-159

      Biography

      N. J. Emenaker is a program officer, Nutritional Science Research Group, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

      Biography

      A. J. Vargas is a health science policy analyst and executive secretary, National Institutes of Health Prevention Research Coordinating Committee, Office of Disease Prevention, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.