Main outcome measures
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
- Challenges involved in measuring intake in early life: Focus on methods.Proc Nutr Soc. 2014; 73: 201-209
- Dietary assessment instruments for preschool children: Reliability of parental responses to the 24-hour recall and a food frequency questionnaire.J Am Diet Assoc. 1990; 90: 814-820
- What are preschool children eating? A review of dietary assessment.Annu Rev Nutr. 2001; 21: 475-498
- A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water.J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110: 1501-1510
- Measuring food intake with digital photography.J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014; 27: 72-81
- Use of technology in children's dietary assessment.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009; 63: S50-S57
- Validity and feasibility of a digital diet method for use with preschool children: A pilot study.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012; 44: 618-623
- Characterizing lunch meals served and consumed by preschool children in Head Start.Public Health Nutr. 2013; 16: 2169-2177
- Characterizing dinner meals served and consumed by preschool children in Head Start.J Child Obes. 2012; 8: 467-477
- A novel method to remotely measure food intake of free-living individuals in real time: The remote food photography method.Br J Nutr. 2009; 101: 446-456
- Validity of the Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) for estimating energy and nutrient intake in near real-time.Obesity. 2012; 20: 891-899
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 2012. USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 5.0. http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/fsrg. Accessed April 12, 2017.
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group. What We Eat in America Food Categories 2007-2008. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group; 2013. http://www.ars.usda.gov/services/docs.htm?docid=23429. Accessed April 12, 2017.
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group. What We Eat in America Food Categories 2009-2010. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group; 2013. http://www.ars.usda.gov/services/docs.htm?docid=23429. Accessed April 12, 2017.
SAS [computer program]. Version 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2012.
- Understanding Bland Altman analysis.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015; 25: 141-151
- Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310
- Design, analysis and interpretation of method-comparison studies.AACN Adv Crit Care. 2008; 19: 223-234
- Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8: 135-160
- Application and interpretation of multiple statistical tests to evaluate validity of dietary intake assessment methods.J Nutr. 2015; 14: 40
- Overestimation of infant and toddler energy intake by 24-h recall compared with weighed food records.Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 88: 407-415
- Feasibility and validity of mobile phones to assess dietary intake.Nutrition. 2014; 30: 1257-1266
STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST Pennington Biomedical Research Center/Louisiana State University System has an interest in the intellectual property surrounding the Smart Intake app and Corby Martin is listed as an inventor of the approach.
FUNDING/SUPPORT This work was funded by National Institutes of Health. Partial support was received from the US Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service through specific cooperative agreement 58-3092-5-001, partial support was received from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (National Institutes of Health) grant number U54 GM104940, which funds the Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center. Also partial support received from the Nutrition Obesity Research Center; grant P30DK072476 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, grant 1R01CA142919-01A1 from the National Cancer Institute, and grant F32 HL123242 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The funding agencies had no input into the study design, data analytical plan, results, or interpretation of the data. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01725347.