Research Original Research| Volume 117, ISSUE 9, P1366-1374.e6, September 2017

Download started.


No Fat, No Sugar, No Salt . . . No Problem? Prevalence of “Low-Content” Nutrient Claims and Their Associations with the Nutritional Profile of Food and Beverage Purchases in the United States

Published:March 15, 2017DOI:



      Nutrient claims are a commonly used marketing tactic, but the association between claims and nutritional quality of products is unknown. The objective of this study was to examine trends in the proportion of packaged food and beverage purchases with a nutrient claim, whether claims are associated with improved nutritional profile, and whether the proportion of purchases with claims differs by race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status.


      This cross-sectional study examined nutrient claims on more than 80 million food and beverage purchases from a transaction-level database of 40,000 US households from 2008 to 2012. χ2 Tests were used to examine whether the proportion of purchases with a low/no-content claim changed over time or differed by race/ethnicity or household socioeconomic status. Pooled transactions were examined using t-tests to compare products’ nutritional profiles overall and by food and beverage group.


      Thirteen percent of food and 35% of beverage purchases had a low-content claim. Prevalence of claims among purchases did not change over time. Low-fat claims were most prevalent for both foods and beverages (10% and 19%, respectively), followed by low-calorie (3% and 9%), low-sugar (2% and 8%), and low-sodium (2% for both) claims. Compared to purchases with no claim, purchases with any low-content claim had lower mean energy, total sugar, total fat, and sodium densities. However, the association between particular claim types and specific nutrient densities varied substantially, and purchases featuring a given low-content claim did not necessarily offer better overall nutritional profiles or better profiles for the claimed nutrient, relative to products without claims. In addition, there was substantial heterogeneity in associations between claims and nutrient densities within food and beverage groups.


      Variations in nutrient density by claim type and food and beverage group suggests that claims may have differential utility for certain foods or nutrients and, in some cases, may mislead about the overall nutritional quality of the food.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Glanz K.
        • Bader M.D.
        • Iyer S.
        Retail grocery store marketing strategies and obesity: An integrative review.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: 503-512
        • Seiders K.
        • Petty R.D.
        Obesity and the role of food marketing: A policy analysis of issues and remedies.
        J Public Policy Mark. 2004; 23: 153-169
        • Harris J.L.
        • Pomeranz J.L.
        • Lobstein T.
        • Brownell K.D.
        A crisis in the marketplace: How food marketing contributes to childhood obesity and what can be done.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2009; 30: 211-225
      1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. A food labeling guide: Guidance for industry. Published January 2013. Accessed June 23, 2016.

        • Colby S.E.
        • Johnson L.
        • Scheett A.
        • Hoverson B.
        Nutrition marketing on food labels.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: 92-98
        • Bech-Larsen T.
        • Grunert K.G.
        The perceived healthiness of functional foods.
        Appetite. 2003; 40: 9-14
        • Freimuth V.S.
        • Hammond S.L.
        • Stein J.A.
        Health advertising: Prevention for profit.
        Am J Public Health. 1988; 78: 557-561
        • Brandt M.B.
        • Moss J.
        • Ellwood K.
        • Ferguson M.
        • Asefa A.
        Tracking label claims.
        Food Technol. 2009; 64: 34-40
        • Sylvetsky A.C.
        • Welsh J.A.
        • Brown R.J.
        • Vos M.B.
        Low-calorie sweetener consumption is increasing in the United States.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 96: 640-646
        • Piernas C.
        • Ng S.
        • Popkin B.
        Trends in purchases and intake of foods and beverages containing caloric and low-calorie sweeteners over the last decade in the United States.
        Pediatr Obes. 2013; 8: 294-306
        • Balcombe K.
        • Fraser I.
        • Di Falco S.
        Traffic lights and food choice: A choice experiment examining the relationship between nutritional food labels and price.
        Food Policy. 2010; 35: 211-220
        • Vyth E.L.
        • Steenhuis I.H.
        • Vlot J.A.
        • et al.
        Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: Consumers’ motives in food choice.
        Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13: 1882
        • Williams P.
        Consumer understanding and use of health claims for foods.
        Nutr Rev. 2005; 63: 256-264
      2. IRI Consumer Network Panel. Information Resources, Inc; 2008-2012. Accessed October 2015.

      3. Sweitzer M, Levin D, Okrent A, et al. Understanding IRI household-based and store-based scanner data. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Technical Bulletin 1942. Published April 2016. Accessed June 2016.

      4. Microsoft SQL Server.
        ([computer program]. Version 2014) Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA2014
      5. MatLab.
        ([computer program]. Version 2014b) MathWorks, Natick, MA2014
      6. Excel.
        ([computer program]. Version 2013) Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA2013
        • Wansink B.
        • Chandon P.
        Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity?.
        J Mark Res. 2006; 43: 605-617
        • Sylvetsky A.C.
        • Dietz W.H.
        Nutrient-content claims—Guidance or cause for confusion?.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 195-198
        • Chandon P.
        How package design and packaged-based marketing claims lead to overeating.
        Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2012; 35: 7-31
        • Chandon P.
        • Wansink B.
        Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.
        Nutr Rev. 2012; 70: 571-593
      7. United States Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR 101, Food Labeling. Published 2016. Accessed November 7, 2016.

      8. Vergara E, Henao LA. Chile seeks to fight obesity with new food labeling law. The Big Story. Published 2016. Accessed September 1, 2016.

        • Ollberding N.J.
        • Wolf R.L.
        • Contento I.
        Food label use and its relation to dietary intake among US adults.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111: S47-S51
        • Campos S.
        • Doxey J.
        • Hammond D.
        Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: A systematic review.
        Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 1496-1506
        • Kirkpatrick S.I.
        • Dodd K.W.
        • Reedy J.
        • Krebs-Smith S.M.
        Income and race/ethnicity are associated with adherence to food-based dietary guidance among US adults and children.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112: 624-635. e6
        • Wang D.D.
        • Leung C.W.
        • Li Y.
        • et al.
        Trends in dietary quality among adults in the United States, 1999 through 2010.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 1587-1595
        • Krueger P.M.
        • Reither E.N.
        Mind the gap: Race/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in obesity.
        Curr Diab Rep. 2015; 15: 95
        • Guthrie J.F.
        • Fox J.J.
        • Cleveland L.E.
        • Welsh S.
        Who uses nutrition labeling, and what effects does label use have on diet quality?.
        J Nutr Educ. 1995; 27: 163-172


      L. S. Taillie is a research assistant professor, Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and a Fellow at the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


      S. W. Ng is an associate research professor, Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and a Fellow at the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


      Y. Xue is a senior data scientist, Duke-UNC USDA Center for Behavioral Economics and Healthy Food Choice Research, Duke University, Durham.


      E. Busey is a research assistant, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


      M. Harding is an associate professor of Economics and Statistics, University of California, Irvine.

      Linked Article

      • Erratum
        Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and DieteticsVol. 118Issue 6
        • Preview
          In the article “No Fat, No Sugar, No Salt . . . No Problem? Prevalence of ‘Low-Content’ Nutrient Claims and Their Associations with the Nutritional Profile of Food and Beverage Purchases in the United States,” published in the September 2017 issue of the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the authors and web address listed for reference 15 (p 1373) are incorrect. Reference 15 should read as follows: Muth MK, Sweitzer M, Brown D, et al. Understanding IRI household-based and store-based scanner data.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF