USDA. Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) frequently asked questions. http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/frequently-asked-questions-about-wic - 3. Published January 14, 2014. Accessed October 20, 2014.
- Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children participation and infants' growth and health: A multisite surveillance study.Pediatrics. 2004; 114: 169-176
USDA. WIC nutrition education guidance. http://www.nal.usda.gov/wicworks/Learning_Center/ntredguidance.pdf. Published January 2006. Accessed October 15, 2014.
- Participant-centered education: Building a new WIC nutrition education model.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: S39-S46
- favorable impact of nutrition education on California WIC families.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: S2-S10
- A client-centered nutrition education model: Lessons learned from Texas WIC.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: 54-61
- Pilot using World Wide Web to prevent diabetes in adolescents.Clin Nurs Res. 2006; 15: 67-79
- Increasing nutrition literacy: Testing the effectiveness of print, Web site, and game modalities.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008; 40: 3-10
- A systematic review of information and communication technology–based interventions for promoting physical activity behavior change in children and adolescents.J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13: e48
- Randomized trial of a tailored nutrition education CD-ROM program for women receiving food assistance.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004; 36: 58-66
- wichealth.org: Impact of a stages of change-based internet nutrition education program.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38: 222-229
- Evaluating a bilingual video to improve infant feeding knowledge and behavior among immigrant Latina mothers.J Community Health. 2010; 35: 464-470
- Nutrition education via a touchscreen: A randomized controlled trial in Latino immigrant parents of infants and toddlers.Acad Pediatr. 2012; 12: 412-419
- Food safety education using an interactive multimedia kiosk in a WIC Setting: Correlates of client satisfaction and practical issues.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: 202-207
- School-based Internet-tailored fruit and vegetable education combined with brief counselling increases children's awareness of intake levels.Public Health Nutr. 2007; 10: 273-279
- Food, fun, and fitness internet program for girls: Pilot evaluation of an e-Health youth obesity prevention program examining predictors of obesity.Prev Med. 2008; 47: 494-497
- Web-based nutrition education intervention improves self-efficacy and self-regulation related to increased dairy intake in college students.J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110: 1723-1727
- Increased self-efficacy for vegetable preparation following an online, skill-based intervention and in-class tasting experience as a part of a general education college nutrition course.Am J Health Promot. 2011; 26: 14-20
- Pilot evaluation of the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Food-O-Meter, a computer-tailored nutrition advice for adolescents: A study in six European cities.Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 1292-1302
- Evaluation of the web-based computer-tailored fataintphat intervention to promote energy balance among adolescents: Results from a school cluster randomized trial.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012; 166: 248-255
- Web-based guide to health: Relationship of theoretical variables to change in physical activity, nutrition and weight at 16-months.J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13: e27
- The efficacy of the Web-Based Childhood Obesity Prevention Program in Chinese American Adolescents (Web ABC Study).J Adolesc Health. 2011; 49: 148-154
- Impact of Internet vs traditional Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children nutrition education on fruit and vegetable intake.J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111: 749-755
- Preventing the obesity epidemic by second generation tailored health communication: An interdisciplinary review.J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12: e24
- A review of electronic interventions for prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in young people.Obes Rev. 2011; 12: e298-e314
Who’s online: Internet user demographics. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/. Published January 2014. Accessed October 15, 2014.
Cell phone and smartphone ownership demographics. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/mobile/cell-phone-and-smartphone-ownership-demographics/. Published January 2014. Accessed October 15, 2014.
- Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: Digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts.Telecomm Policy. 2003; 27: 597-623
Zickuhr K, Smith A. Digital differences. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Digital_differences_041312.pdf. Published April 13, 2012. Accessed October 15, 2014.
- Accessibility and preferred use of online Web applications among WIC participants with Internet access.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: S87-S92
- Guiding family-based obesity prevention efforts in children, Part 1: What determinants do we target?.Int J Child Adolesc Health. 2009; 2: 19-30
- Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015; 47: 109-114
- Using learner-centered education to improve fruit and vegetable intake in California WIC participants.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: 216-224
Townsend M, Sylva K, Shilts M, Davidson C, Leavens L, Sitnick S. Healthy Kids Survey. http://townsendlab.ucdavis.edu/PDF_Files/healthykids/HKbooklet.pdf. Published 2011. Accessed October 15, 2014.
- Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.in: Pajares F. Urdan T. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT2006
- Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity.Pediatr. 2010; 126: e26-e32
- Comparison of a Web-based vs in-person nutrition education program for low-income adults.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 120-126
- The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: A meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes.J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6: e40
Supplementary materials: Podcast available at www.andjrnl.org/content/podcast
STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
FUNDING/SUPPORT This project received federal funds from the US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, through grant no. WIC NEI-12-TX to Baylor of College of Medicine to the Nutrition Policy Institute at the University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the view or policies of the US Department of Agriculture, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government.