Online and In-Person Nutrition Education Improves Breakfast Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Randomized Trial of Participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children

Published:December 03, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.10.012

      Abstract

      Background

      Although in-person education is expected to remain central to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) service delivery, effective online nutrition education has the potential for increased exposure to quality education and a positive influence on nutrition behaviors in WIC participants. Education focused on promoting healthy breakfast behaviors is an important topic for WIC participants because breakfast eating compared with breakfast skipping has been associated with a higher-quality diet and decreased risk for obesity.

      Objective

      To examine the influences of online and in-person group nutrition education on changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to breakfast eating.

      Design

      Randomized-controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of online and in-person nutrition education between March and September 2014.

      Participants/setting

      Five hundred ninety WIC participants from two Los Angeles, CA, WIC clinics were randomly assigned to receive in-person group education (n=359) or online education (n=231). Education focused on ways to reduce breakfast skipping and promoted healthy options at breakfast for parents and their 1- to 5-year-old children participating in WIC. Questionnaires assessing breakfast-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors were administered before and after education, and at a 2- to 4-month follow-up.

      Statistical analysis

      Changes within and between in-person and online groups were compared using t tests and χ2 tests. Analysis of covariance and generalized estimating equations were used to assess differences in change between groups.

      Results

      Changes in knowledge between pretest and follow-up at 2 to 4 months were similar between groups. Both groups reported reductions in barriers to eating breakfast due to time constraints, not having enough foods at home, and difficulty with preparation. Increases in the frequency of eating breakfast were greater for both the parent (P=0.0007) and child (P=0.01) in the online group compared with the in-person group during the same time points.

      Conclusions

      Overall, this study demonstrates that both in-person and online nutrition education were effective in increasing breakfast-related knowledge in WIC participants, reducing breakfast skipping, and improving other breakfast-related behaviors, showing the potential usefulness for online education modalities for future WIC services.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. USDA. Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) frequently asked questions. http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/frequently-asked-questions-about-wic - 3. Published January 14, 2014. Accessed October 20, 2014.

        • Black M.M.
        • Cutts D.B.
        • Frank D.A.
        • et al.
        Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children participation and infants' growth and health: A multisite surveillance study.
        Pediatrics. 2004; 114: 169-176
      2. USDA. WIC nutrition education guidance. http://www.nal.usda.gov/wicworks/Learning_Center/ntredguidance.pdf. Published January 2006. Accessed October 15, 2014.

        • Deehy K.
        • Hoger F.S.
        • Kallio J.
        • et al.
        Participant-centered education: Building a new WIC nutrition education model.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: S39-S46
        • Ritchie L.D.
        • Whaley S.E.
        • Spector P.
        • Gomez J.
        • Crawford P.B.
        favorable impact of nutrition education on California WIC families.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: S2-S10
        • Isbell M.G.
        • Seth J.G.
        • Atwood R.D.
        • Ray T.C.
        A client-centered nutrition education model: Lessons learned from Texas WIC.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: 54-61
        • Long J.D.
        • Armstrong M.L.
        • Amos E.
        • et al.
        Pilot using World Wide Web to prevent diabetes in adolescents.
        Clin Nurs Res. 2006; 15: 67-79
        • Silk K.J.
        • Sherry J.
        • Winn B.
        • Keesecker N.
        • Horodynski M.A.
        • Sayir A.
        Increasing nutrition literacy: Testing the effectiveness of print, Web site, and game modalities.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008; 40: 3-10
        • Lau W.C.P.
        • Lau Y.E.
        • Wong P.D.
        • Ransdell L.
        A systematic review of information and communication technology–based interventions for promoting physical activity behavior change in children and adolescents.
        J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13: e48
        • Campbell M.K.
        • Carbone E.
        • Honess-Morreale L.
        • Heisler-MacKinnon J.
        • Demissie S.
        • Farrell D.
        Randomized trial of a tailored nutrition education CD-ROM program for women receiving food assistance.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004; 36: 58-66
        • Bensley R.J.
        • Brusk J.J.
        • Anderson J.V.
        • Mercer N.
        • Rivas J.
        • Broadbent L.N.
        wichealth.org: Impact of a stages of change-based internet nutrition education program.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38: 222-229
        • Scheinmann R.
        • Chiasson M.
        • Hartel D.
        • Rosenberg T.
        Evaluating a bilingual video to improve infant feeding knowledge and behavior among immigrant Latina mothers.
        J Community Health. 2010; 35: 464-470
        • Thompson D.A.
        • Joshi A.
        • Hernandez R.G.
        • et al.
        Nutrition education via a touchscreen: A randomized controlled trial in Latino immigrant parents of infants and toddlers.
        Acad Pediatr. 2012; 12: 412-419
        • Trepka M.J.
        • Newman F.L.
        • Huffman F.G.
        • Dixon Z.
        Food safety education using an interactive multimedia kiosk in a WIC Setting: Correlates of client satisfaction and practical issues.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: 202-207
        • Mangunkusumo R.T.
        • Brug J.
        • de Koning H.J.
        • van der Lei J.
        • Raat H.
        School-based Internet-tailored fruit and vegetable education combined with brief counselling increases children's awareness of intake levels.
        Public Health Nutr. 2007; 10: 273-279
        • Thompson D.
        • Baranowski T.
        • Cullen K.
        • et al.
        Food, fun, and fitness internet program for girls: Pilot evaluation of an e-Health youth obesity prevention program examining predictors of obesity.
        Prev Med. 2008; 47: 494-497
        • Poddar K.H.
        • Hosig K.W.
        • Anderson E.S.
        • Nickols-Richardson S.M.
        • Duncan S.E.
        Web-based nutrition education intervention improves self-efficacy and self-regulation related to increased dairy intake in college students.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110: 1723-1727
        • Brown K.N.
        • Wengreen H.J.
        • Vitale T.S.
        • Anderson J.B.
        Increased self-efficacy for vegetable preparation following an online, skill-based intervention and in-class tasting experience as a part of a general education college nutrition course.
        Am J Health Promot. 2011; 26: 14-20
        • Maes L.
        • Cook T.L.
        • Ottovaere C.
        • et al.
        Pilot evaluation of the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Food-O-Meter, a computer-tailored nutrition advice for adolescents: A study in six European cities.
        Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 1292-1302
        • Ezendam N.M.
        • Brug J.
        • Oenema A.
        Evaluation of the web-based computer-tailored fataintphat intervention to promote energy balance among adolescents: Results from a school cluster randomized trial.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012; 166: 248-255
        • Anderson-Bill S.E.
        • Winett A.R.
        • Wojcik R.J.
        • Winett G.S.
        Web-based guide to health: Relationship of theoretical variables to change in physical activity, nutrition and weight at 16-months.
        J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13: e27
        • Chen J.-L.
        • Weiss S.
        • Heyman M.B.
        • Cooper B.
        • Lustig R.H.
        The efficacy of the Web-Based Childhood Obesity Prevention Program in Chinese American Adolescents (Web ABC Study).
        J Adolesc Health. 2011; 49: 148-154
        • Bensley R.J.
        • Anderson J.V.
        • Brusk J.J.
        • Mercer N.
        • Rivas J.
        Impact of Internet vs traditional Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children nutrition education on fruit and vegetable intake.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111: 749-755
        • Enwald K.H.P.
        • Huotari A.M.-L.
        Preventing the obesity epidemic by second generation tailored health communication: An interdisciplinary review.
        J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12: e24
        • Nguyen B.
        • Kornman K.P.
        • Baur L.A.
        A review of electronic interventions for prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in young people.
        Obes Rev. 2011; 12: e298-e314
      3. Who’s online: Internet user demographics. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/. Published January 2014. Accessed October 15, 2014.

      4. Cell phone and smartphone ownership demographics. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/mobile/cell-phone-and-smartphone-ownership-demographics/. Published January 2014. Accessed October 15, 2014.

        • Rice R.E.
        • Katz J.E.
        Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: Digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts.
        Telecomm Policy. 2003; 27: 597-623
      5. Zickuhr K, Smith A. Digital differences. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Digital_differences_041312.pdf. Published April 13, 2012. Accessed October 15, 2014.

        • Bensley R.J.
        • Hovis A.
        • Horton K.D.
        • et al.
        Accessibility and preferred use of online Web applications among WIC participants with Internet access.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: S87-S92
        • Ontai L RL
        • Williams S.T.
        • Young T.
        • Townsend M.S.
        Guiding family-based obesity prevention efforts in children, Part 1: What determinants do we target?.
        Int J Child Adolesc Health. 2009; 2: 19-30
        • Gilboy M.B.
        • Heinerichs S.
        • Pazzaglia G.
        Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015; 47: 109-114
        • Gerstein D.E.
        • Martin A.C.
        • Crocker N.
        • Reed H.
        • Elfant M.
        • Crawford P.
        Using learner-centered education to improve fruit and vegetable intake in California WIC participants.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: 216-224
      6. Townsend M, Sylva K, Shilts M, Davidson C, Leavens L, Sitnick S. Healthy Kids Survey. http://townsendlab.ucdavis.edu/PDF_Files/healthykids/HKbooklet.pdf. Published 2011. Accessed October 15, 2014.

        • Bandura A.
        Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.
        in: Pajares F. Urdan T. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT2006
        • Hager E.R.
        • Quigg A.M.
        • Black M.M.
        • et al.
        Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity.
        Pediatr. 2010; 126: e26-e32
        • Neuenschwander L.M.
        • Abbott A.
        • Mobley A.R.
        Comparison of a Web-based vs in-person nutrition education program for low-income adults.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 120-126
        • Wantland J.D.
        • Portillo J.C.
        • Holzemer L.W.
        • Slaughter R.
        • McGhee M.E.
        The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: A meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes.
        J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6: e40

      Biography

      L. E. Au is an assistant researcher, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Berkeley.

      Biography

      S. Whaley is the director, Research and Evaluation, Public Health Foundation Enterprises WIC, Irwindale, CA.

      Biography

      M. Meza is an executive assistant, Special Projects, Public Health Foundation Enterprises WIC, Irwindale, CA.

      Biography

      N. J. Rosen is a senior associate, Informing Change, Berkeley, CA.

      Biography

      L. D. Ritchie is the director and a cooperative extension specialist, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland.