Main outcome measures
Statistical analyses performed
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
- Food labeling: Mandatory status of nutrition labeling and nutrient content revision, format for nutrition label. 58 Federal Register 2079.1993 (codified at 21 CFR §101.9)
- 2008 FDA Health and Diet Survey topline frequencies.Updated November 28, 2011. Accessed April 27, 2012)
- Food label use and its relation to dietary intake among US adults.J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110: 1233-1237
- Nutrition labels decrease energy intake in adults consuming lunch in the laboratory.J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110: 1094-1097
- Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010.JAMA. 2012; 307: 491-497
- Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.JAMA. 2012; 307: 483-490
- Calories count: Report of the Working Group on Obesity.Published March 12, 2004. Updated November 10, 2011. Accessed April 27, 2012)
- Food labeling: Prominence of calories. 70 Federal Register 17008.2005
- Food labeling: Serving sizes of products that can reasonably be consumed at one eating occasion; updating the reference amounts customarily consumed; approaches for recommending smaller portion sizes. 70 Federal Register 17010.2005
- Food labeling: Mandatory status of nutrition labeling and nutrient content revision, format for nutrition label. 58 Federal Register 2079.1993 (codified at 21 CFR §101.12)
- Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers.Annu Rev Nutr. 2004; 24: 455-479
- The effect of marketer-suggested serving size on consumer responses: The unintended consequences of consumer attention to calorie information.J Mark. 2012; 76: 59-75
- Patients' understanding and use of snack food package nutrition labels.J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004; 17: 319-323
- Helping consumers make more healthful food choices: Consumer views on modifying food labels and providing point-of-purchase nutrition information at quick-service restaurants.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007; 39: 157-163
- The effect of single serving versus entire package nutritional information on consumption norms and actual consumption of a snack food.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38: 365-370
- Effect of low-carbohydrate claims on consumer perceptions about food products' healthfulness and helpfulness for weight management.J Nutr Educ and Behav. 2010; 42: 315-320
- How do consumers interpret health messages on food labels?.Nutrition Today. 2008; 43: 267-272
- Consumers' ability to perform tasks using nutrition labels.J Nutr Educ. 1998; 30: 210-217
- More effective nutrition label formats are not nececessarily preferred.J Am Diet Assoc. 1992; 92: 1230-1234
- Performance characteristics of seven nutrition label formats.J Public Policy Mark. 1996; 15: 1-15
- Do dietary intakes affect search for nutrient information on food labels?.Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59: 1955-1967
Supplementary materials: Podcast available at www.andjrnl.org/content/podcast
STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
FUNDING/SUPPORT All funding for this study was provided by the US Food and Drug Administration.