Advertisement

NOTICE: We are experiencing technical issues with Academy members trying to log into the JAND site using Academy member login credentials. We are working to resolve the issue as soon as possible. Alternatively, if you are an Academy member, you can access the JAND site by registering for an Elsevier account and claiming access using the links at the top of the JAND site. Email us at [email protected] for assistance. Thanks for your patience!

Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Promoting and Supporting Breastfeeding

Published:February 23, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2014.12.014

      Abstract

      It is the position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics that exclusive breastfeeding provides optimal nutrition and health protection for the first 6 months of life, and that breastfeeding with complementary foods from 6 months until at least 12 months of age is the ideal feeding pattern for infants. Breastfeeding is an important public health strategy for improving infant and child morbidity and mortality, improving maternal morbidity, and helping to control health care costs. Research continues to support the positive effects of human milk on infant and maternal health, as it is a living biological fluid with many qualities not replicable by human milk substitutes. Recent research advancements include a greater understanding of the human gut microbiome, the protective effect of human milk for premature infants and those born to women experiencing gestational diabetes mellitus, the relationship of breastfeeding with human immunodeficiency virus, and the increased ability to characterize cellular components of human milk. Registered dietitian nutritionists and nutrition and dietetics technicians, registered, should continue efforts to shift the norm of infant feeding away from use of human milk substitutes and toward human milk feeds. The role of registered dietitian nutritionists and nutrition and dietetics technicians, registered, in breastfeeding promotion and support, in the context of the professional code of ethics and the World Health Organization’s International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes, are discussed in the “Practice Paper of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Promoting and Supporting Breastfeeding,” published on the Academy website at: www.eatright.org/positions.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American Dietetic Association
        Position of the American Dietetic Association: Promoting and supporting breastfeeding.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109: 1926-1942
      1. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Practice Paper of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Promoting and Supporting Breastfeeding. http://www.eatrightpro.org/resources/practice/position-and-practice-papers/practice-papers. Accessed February 2, 2014.

        • Eidelman A.I.
        • Schanler R.J.
        • Johnston M.
        • et al.
        Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.
        Pediatrics. 2012; 129: E827-E841
        • Bartick M.
        Mothers' costs of suboptimal breastfeeding: Implications of the maternal disease cost analysis.
        Breastfeed Med. 2013; 8: 448-449
        • Bartick M.
        • Reinhold A.
        The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: A pediatric cost analysis.
        Pediatrics. 2010; 125: E1048-E1056
        • Bartick M.C.
        • Stuebe A.M.
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Luongo C.
        • Reinhold A.G.
        • Foster E.M.
        Cost analysis of maternal disease associated with suboptimal breastfeeding.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 111-119
      2. World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/9241562218/en. Published 2003. Accessed October 11, 2014.

        • Donovan S.M.
        • Wang M.
        • Li M.
        • Friedberg I.
        • Schwartz S.L.
        • Chapkin R.S.
        Host-microbe interactions in the neonatal intestine: Role of human milk oligosaccharides.
        Adv Nutr. 2012; 3: 450S-455S
        • Bertino E.
        • Giuliani F.
        • Baricco M.
        • et al.
        Benefits of donor milk in the feeding of preterm infants.
        Early Hum Dev. 2013; 89: S3-S6
        • Hassiotou F.
        • Geddes D.T.
        • Hartmann P.E.
        Cells in human milk: State of the science.
        J Hum Lact. 2013; 29: 171-182
        • Neville M.C.
        • Anderson S.M.
        • McManaman J.L.
        • et al.
        Lactation and neonatal nutrition: Defining and refining the critical questions.
        J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012; 17: 167-188
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Brown J.S.
        • Creasman J.M.
        • et al.
        Lactation and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: A population-based study.
        Am J Med. 2010; 123: 863.e1-863.e6
        • Oberhelman S.S.
        • Meekins M.E.
        • Fischer P.R.
        • et al.
        Maternal vitamin D supplementation to improve the vitamin D status of breast-fed infants: A randomized controlled trial.
        Mayo Clin Proceed. 2013; 88: 1378-1387
      3. Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/Dietary-Reference-Intakes-for-Calcium-and-Vitamin-D.aspx. Published 2011. Accessed October 11, 2014.

        • Chapman D.J.
        • Nommsen-Rivers L.
        Impact of maternal nutritional status on breast milk quality and infant outcomes: An update on key nutrients.
        Adv Nutr. 2012; 3: 350-352
        • Allen L.H.
        B vitamins in breast milk: Relative importance of maternal status and intake, and effects on infant status and function.
        Adv Nutr. 2012; 3: 362-369
      4. Horta BL BR, Martines JC, Victora CG. Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2007/9789241595230_eng.pdf. Published 2007. Accessed March 14, 2014.

        • Ip S.
        • Chung M.
        • Raman G.
        • et al.
        Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries.
        Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2007; : 1-186
        • Anothaisintawee T.
        • Wiratkapun C.
        • Lerdsitthichai P.
        • et al.
        Risk factors of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Asia Pac J Public Health. 2013; 25: 368-387
        • Dogaru C.M.
        • Nyffenegger D.
        • Pescatore A.M.
        • Spycher B.D.
        • Kuehni C.E.
        Breastfeeding and childhood asthma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2014; 179: 1153-1167
        • Hauck F.R.
        • Thompson J.M.D.
        • Tanabe K.O.
        • Moon R.Y.
        • Vennemann M.M.
        Breastfeeding and reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome: A meta-analysis.
        Pediatrics. 2011; 128: 103-110
        • Luan N.N.
        • Wu Q.J.
        • Gong T.T.
        • Vogtmann E.
        • Wang Y.L.
        • Lin B.
        Breastfeeding and ovarian cancer risk: A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 98: 1020-1031
        • Weng S.F.
        • Redsell S.A.
        • Swift J.A.
        • Yang M.
        • Glazebrook C.P.
        Systematic review and meta-analyses of risk factors for childhood overweight identifiable during infancy.
        Arch Dis Child. 2012; 97: 1019-1026
      5. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 Maternal, Infant, and Child Health Objectives. HealthPeople.gov website. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health. Publishesd 2012. Accessed October 11, 2014.

      6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding Report Card 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/reportcard.htm. Published 2013. Accessed October 11, 2014.

        • Ip S.
        • Chung M.
        • Raman G.
        • Trikalinos T.A.
        • Lau J.
        A summary of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Evidence Report on Breastfeeding in Developed Countries.
        Breastfeed Med. 2009; 4: S17-S30
        • Dieterich C.M.
        • Felice J.P.
        • O'Sullivan E.
        • Rasmussen K.M.
        Breastfeeding and health outcomes for the mother-infant dyad.
        Pediatr Clin N Am. 2013; 60: 31-48
      7. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/calls/breastfeeding. Published 2011. Accessed October 11, 2014.

        • Menon G.
        • Williams T.C.
        Human milk for preterm infants: Why, what, when and how?.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013; 98: F559-F562
        • Vennemann M.M.
        • Bajanowski T.
        • Brinkmann B.
        • et al.
        Does breastfeeding reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome?.
        Pediatrics. 2009; 123: e406-e410
        • Figueiredo B.
        • Canário C.
        • Field T.
        Breastfeeding is negatively affected by prenatal depression and reduces postpartum depression.
        Psychol Med. 2014; 44: 927-936
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Ray R.M.
        • Stuebe A.M.
        • et al.
        Duration of lactation and risk factors for maternal cardiovascular disease.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 974-982
        • Turkoz F.P.
        • Solak M.
        • Petekkaya I.
        • et al.
        Association between common risk factors and molecular subtypes in breast cancer patients.
        Breast. 2013; 22: 344-350
        • Bai Y.
        • Middlestadt S.E.
        • Peng C.Y.J.
        • Fly A.D.
        Predictors of continuation of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life.
        J Hum Lact. 2010; 26: 26-34
        • Ahluwalia I.B.
        • Morrow B.
        • D'Angelo D.
        • Li R.W.
        Maternity care practices and breastfeeding experiences of women in different racial and ethnic groups: Pregnancy risk assessment and monitoring system (PRAMS).
        Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16: 1672-1678
        • Wagner E.A.
        • Chantry C.J.
        • Dewey K.G.
        • Nommsen-Rivers L.A.
        Breastfeeding concerns at 3 and 7 days postpartum and feeding status at 2 months.
        Pediatrics. 2013; 132: E865-E875
        • Trout K.K.
        • Averbuch T.
        • Barowski M.
        Promoting breastfeeding among obese women and women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
        Curr Diab Rep. 2011; 11: 7-12
        • Chertok I.R.A.
        • Raz I.
        • Shoham I.
        • Haddad H.
        • Wiznitzer A.
        Effects of early breastfeeding on neonatal glucose levels of term infants born to women with gestational diabetes.
        J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009; 22: 166-169
        • Rasmussen K.M.
        • Geraghty S.R.
        The quiet revolution: Breastfeeding transformed with the use of breast pumps.
        Am J Public Health. 2011; 101: 1356-1359