Advertisement

Differential Improvements in Student Fruit and Vegetable Selection and Consumption in Response to the New National School Lunch Program Regulations: A Pilot Study

Published:January 02, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2014.10.021

      Abstract

      Objective

      To investigate changes in student food selection and consumption in response to the new National School Lunch Program meal patterns during fall 2011.

      Design

      Eight elementary and four intermediate schools in one Houston area school district were matched on free/reduced-price meal eligibility and randomized into control or intervention conditions.

      Intervention

      Both intervention and control school cafeterias served the same menu. The intervention school cafeterias posted the new meal pattern daily; students could select one fruit and two vegetable servings per reimbursable meal. Control school students could only select the previous meal pattern: a total of two fruit and vegetable servings per meal.

      Main outcome measures

      Students were observed during lunch: student sex and foods selected/consumed were recorded. Diet analysis software was used to calculate energy/food groups selected/consumed.

      Statistical analyses performed

      Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel χ2 tests examined differences in the percent of students selecting each meal component by condition, controlling for sex, grade, and school free/reduced-price meal eligibility. Analysis of covariance assessed differences in amount of energy/food groups selected and consumed, and differences in percent of food groups consumed.

      Results

      Observations were conducted for 1,149 elementary and 427 intermediate students. Compared with students in the control schools, significantly more intervention elementary and intermediate school students selected total (P<0.001, P<0.05) and starchy vegetables (P<0.001, P<0.01); more intervention intermediate school students selected fruit (P<0.001), legumes (P<0.05), and protein foods (P<0.01). There were significantly greater amounts of these foods selected and consumed, but no differences in the proportion of the foods consumed by condition. Fewer calories were consumed by elementary and intermediate school intervention students.

      Conclusions

      More intervention students selected fruit and vegetables at lunch and consumed them compared with control condition students. Future studies with larger and more diverse student populations are warranted.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

      1. US Department of Agriculture. National School Lunch Program fact sheet. http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/NSLPFactSheet.pdf. Published 2012. Updated September, 2013. Accessed October 29, 2013.

      2. US Department of Agriculture. National School Lunch Program: Participation and meals served. http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/slsummar.htm. Published 2013. Updated October 17, 2013. Accessed October 29, 2013.

      3. Stallings V.A. Suitor C.W. Taylor C.L. School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children. National Academies Press, Washington, DC2009
      4. Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs; Final Rule. 77 Federal Register 4088-4167 (2012).

      5. US Department of Agriculture. Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Governance/Legislation/CNR_2010.htm. Published 2010. Updated August 2, 2013. Accessed August 27, 2013.

      6. US Department of Agriculture. Menu planning in the National School Lunch Program. http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/menu/menu_planning.doc. Published September 1, 2000. Accessed October 29, 2013.

        • Hanks A.S.
        • Wansink B.
        • Just D.R.
        Reliability and accuracy of real-time visualization techniques for measuring school cafeteria tray waste: Validating the quarter-waste method.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014; 114: 470-474
        • Cullen K.W.
        • Himes J.H.
        • Baranowski T.
        • et al.
        Validity and reliability of a behavior-based food coding system for measuring fruit, 100% fruit juice, vegetable, and sweetened beverage consumption: Results from the Girls Health Enrichment Multisite Studies.
        Prev Med. 2004; 38: S24-S33
        • Nutrition Coordinating Center
        NDSR 2013 User Manual.
        University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN2013
        • Cotton P.A.
        • Subar A.F.
        • Friday J.E.
        • Cook A.
        Dietary sources of nutrients among US adults, 1994 to 1996.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2004; 104: 921-930
        • Cohen J.F.
        • Richardson S.
        • Parker E.
        • Catalano P.J.
        • Rimm E.B.
        Impact of the new U.S. Department of Agriculture school meal standards on food selection, consumption, and waste.
        Am J Prev Med. 2014; 46: 388-394
      7. Newman C. Fruit and vegetable consumption by school lunch participants: Implications for the success of new nutrition standards, ERR-154. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err154.aspx. Published August, 2013. Updated August 27, 2013. Accessed September 3, 2013.

        • Perry C.L.
        • Bishop D.B.
        • Taylor G.L.
        • et al.
        A randomized school trial of environmental strategies to encourage fruit and vegetable consumption among children.
        Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31: 65-76
        • Hanks A.S.
        • Just D.R.
        • Wansink B.
        Smarter lunchrooms can address new school lunchroom guidelines and childhood obesity.
        J Pediatr. 2013; 162: 867-869
        • Wansink B.
        • Just D.R.
        • Hanks A.S.
        • Smith L.E.
        Pre-sliced fruit in school cafeterias: Children's selection and intake.
        Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44: 477-480
        • Wansink B.
        • Just D.R.
        • Payne C.R.
        • Klinger M.Z.
        Attractive names sustain increased vegetable intake in schools.
        Prev Med. 2012; 55: 330-332
        • Gordon A.
        • Fox M.K.
        • Clark M.
        • et al.
        School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study III: Volume II: Student Participation and Dietary Intakes—Final Report.
        Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ2007
        • Cullen K.W.
        • Watson K.B.
        • Dave J.M.
        Middle-school students' school lunch consumption does not meet the new Institute of Medicine's National School Lunch Program recommendations.
        Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 1876-1881
        • Smith S.L.
        • Cunningham-Sabo L.
        Food choice, plate waste and nutrient intake of elementary- and middle-school students participating in the US National School Lunch Program.
        Public Health Nutr. 2014; 17: 1255-1263
        • Cohen J.F.
        • Richardson S.
        • Austin S.B.
        • Economos C.D.
        • Rimm E.B.
        School lunch waste among middle school students: Nutrients consumed and costs.
        Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44: 114-121
        • Suarez-Balcazar Y.
        • Redmond L.
        • Kouba J.
        • et al.
        Introducing systems change in the schools: The case of school luncheons and vending machines.
        Am J Community Psychol. 2007; 39: 335-345
        • Hendy H.M.
        Comparison of five teacher actions to encourage children's new food acceptance.
        Ann Behav Med. 1999; 21: 20-26
        • Schwartz M.B.
        The influence of a verbal prompt on school lunch fruit consumption: A pilot study.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007; 4: 6
        • Fulkerson J.A.
        • French S.A.
        • Story M.
        • Nelson H.
        • Hannan P.J.
        Promotions to increase lower-fat food choices among students in secondary schools: Description and outcomes of TACOS (Trying Alternative Cafeteria Options in Schools).
        Public Health Nutr. 2004; 7: 665-674
        • Wechsler H.
        • Basch C.E.
        • Zybert P.
        • Shea S.
        Promoting the selection of low-fat milk in elementary school cafeterias in an inner-city Latino community: Evaluation of an intervention.
        Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 427-433
      8. US Department of Agriculture. Team nutrition. http://www.fns.usda.gov/tn/team-nutrition. Published 2013. Updated March 19, 2014. Accessed March 31, 2014.

      9. Center for Public Policy Priorities. State of Texas Children 2012 -Texas KIDS COUNT annual data book. http://www.cppp.org/sotc/pdf/TKC2012_Final_1-page_view.pdf. Published April 5, 2012. Accessed October 29, 2013.

      Biography

      K. W. Cullen is a professor, US Department of Agriculture/Agriculture Research Service Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

      Biography

      T.-A. Chen is a biostatistician, US Department of Agriculture/Agriculture Research Service Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

      Biography

      J. M. Dave is an assistant professor, US Department of Agriculture/Agriculture Research Service Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

      Biography

      H. Jensen is a professor, Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames.