Why Americans Eat What They Do

Taste, Nutrition, Cost, Convenience, and Weight Control Concerns as Influences on Food Consumption


      Objective To examine the self-reported importance of taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control on personal dietary choices and whether these factors vary across demographic groups, are associated with lifestyle choices related to health (termed health lifestyle), and actually predict eating behavior.
      Design Data are based on responses to 2 self-administered cross-sectional surveys. The main outcomes measured were consumption of fruits and vegetables, fast foods, cheese, and breakfast cereals, which were determined on the basis of responses to questions about usual and recent consumption and a food diary.
      Subjects/setting Respondents were a national sample of 2,967 adults. Response rates were 71% to the first survey and 77% to the second survey (which was sent to people who completed the first survey).
      Statistical analyses Univariate analyses were used to describe importance ratings, bivariate analyses (correlations and t tests) were used to examine demographic and lifestyle differences on importance measures, and multivariate analyses (general linear models) were used to predict lifestyle cluster membership and food consumption.
      Results Respondents reported that taste is the most important influence on their food choices, followed by cost. Demographic and health lifestyle differences were evident across all 5 importance measures. The importance of nutrition and the importance of weight control were predicted best by subject's membership in a particular health lifestyle cluster. When eating behaviors were examined, demographic measures and membership in a health lifestyle cluster predicted consumption of fruits and vegetables, fast foods, cheese, and breakfast cereal. The importance placed on taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control also predicted types of foods consumed.
      Applications Our results suggest that nutritional concerns, per se, are of less relevance to most people than taste and cost. One implication is that nutrition education programs should attempt to design and promote nutritious diets as being tasty and inexpensive. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98:1118-1126.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 4th ed. Washington, DC: US Depts of Agriculture and Health and Human Services; 1995. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232.

      2. Thomas P.R Improving america's diet and health. National Academy Press, Washington, DC1991
      3. The Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health.Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1988. DHHS publication PHS 88-50210.

      4. Ramey FP.Truth and probability. In: Kyburg HE, Smokler HE, eds. Studies in Subjective Probability. New York, NY: John W. Wiley and Sons; 1964.

      5. Glanz K Lewis F.M Rimer B.K Health Behavior and Health Education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif1997
        • Glanz K
        • Eriksen M.P
        Individual and community models for dietary behavior change.
        J Nutr Educ. 1993; 25: 80-86
      6. Carter WB. Health behavior as a rational process: theory of reasoned action and multiattribute utility theory. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK,eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1990;63–91.

        • Edwards W
        The theory of decision-making.
        Psychol Bull. 1954; 51: 380-417
        • Keeney R.L
        Decision analysis.
        Operations Res. 1982; 30: 802-838
        • Nguyen M.N
        • Otis J
        • Potvin L
        Determinants of intention to adopt a low-fat diet in men 30 to 60 years old.
        Am J Health Prom. 1996; 10: 201-207
        • Sporny L.A
        • Contento I.R
        Stages of change in dietary fat reduction.
        J Nutr Educ. 1995; 27: 191-199
        • Lewis C.J
        • Sims L.S
        • Shannon B
        Examination of specific nutrition/health behaviors using a social cognitive model.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1985; 89: 194-202
        • Glanz K
        • Kristal A.R
        • Sorenson G
        • Palombo R
        • Heimendinger J
        • Probart C
        Development and validation of measures of psychological factors influencing fat- and fiber-related dietary behavior.
        Prev Med. 1993; 22: 373-387
        • Kristal A.R
        • Patterson R.E
        • Glanz K
        • Heimendinger J
        • Hebert J
        • Feng Z
        • Probart C
        Psychosocial correlates of healthful diets.
        Prev Med. 1995; 24: 221-228
        • Brug J
        • Lechner L
        • deVries H
        Psychological determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption.
        Appetite. 1995; 25: 285-296
        • Kristal A.K
        • Bowen D.J
        • Curry S.J
        • Shattuck A.L
        • Henry H.J
        Nutrition knowledge, attitudes and perceived norms as correlates of selecting low-fat diets.
        Health Educ Res. 1990; 5: 467-477
        • Brinberg D
        • Durand J.H
        Eating at fast-food restaurants.
        J Appl Social Psych. 1983; 13: 459-472
        • Glanz K
        • Patterson R.E
        • Kristal A.R
        • DiClemente C.C
        • Heimendinger J
        • Linnan L
        • McLerran D
        Stages of change in adopting healthy diets.
        Health Educ Q. 1994; 21: 499-519
        • Maibach E
        • Maxfield A
        • Ladin K
        • Slater M
        Translating health psychology into effective health communication.
        J Health Psychol. 1996; 1: 267-277
      7. SPSS Statistical Manual.Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc; 1994.

        • Drewnowski A
        • Kurth C.L
        • Rahaim J.E
        Taste preferences in human obesity.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 1991; 54: 635-641
        • Contento I.R
        • Basch C
        • Shea S
        • Gutin B
        • Zybert P
        • Michela J.L
        • Rips J
        Relationship of mothers’ food choice criteria to food intake of preschool children.
        Health Educ Q. 1993; 20: 243-259
        • Stewart B
        • Tinsley A
        Importance of food choice influences for working young adults.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1995; 95: 227-230
        • Steptoe A
        • Pollard T.M
        • Wardle J
        Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food.
        Appetite. 1995; 25: 267-284
        • Wirfalt A.K.E
        • Jeffery R.W
        Using cluster analysis to examine dietary patterns.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1997; 97: 272-279
      8. Trends in the United States: Consumer Attitudes and the Supermarket. Washington, DC: Food Marketing Institute; 1992.

        • Glanz K
        • Hewitt A.M
        • Rudd J
        Consumer behavior and nutrition education.
        J Nutr Educ. 1992; 24: 267-277
        • Morreale S.J
        • Schwartz N.E
        Helping Americans eat right.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1995; 95: 305-308
        • Lennernas M
        • Fjellstrom C
        • Becker W
        • Giachetti I
        • Schmitt A
        • Remaut de Winter A
        • Kearney M
        Influences on food choice perceived to be important by nationally-representative samples of adults in the European Union.
        Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997; 51: S8-S15
        • Lloyd H.M
        • Paisley C.M
        • Mela D.J
        Barriers to the adoption of reduced-fat diets in a UK population.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1995; 95: 316-322
        • Rudd J
        • Glanz K
        How individuals use information for health action.
        in: Glanz K Lewis F.M Rimer B.K Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, Research and Practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif1990: 115-139
        • Hess M.A
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1997; 97: S205-S207