Advertisement

Effect of a Nutrient Rich Foods Consumer Education Program: Results from the Nutrition Advice Study

Published:November 04, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.031

      Abstract

      Background

      The Nutrient Rich Foods (NRF) approach to eating uses the NRF Index, a nutrient profiling metric to help consumers choose foods that contain more vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients per kilocalorie. Research is needed to test the efficacy of dietary guidance using nutrient profiling systems to rank foods.

      Objective

      To examine whether nutrition education and supporting materials would increase understanding of the NRF approach and improve food shopping, meal planning, consumption of nutrient-rich foods, and diet quality.

      Design

      Unbalanced randomized controlled trial conducted in February to May 2009 with participants assigned to NRF education group (n=128) or control group receiving standard nutrition education (n=61).

      Participants/setting

      Adult primary food shoppers and preparers with at least one child in the household aged 3 to 17 years.

      Intervention

      Group education session and support tools (pocket guide, shopping list, refrigerator magnet, weekly e-mail messages, and biweekly mailings).

      Main outcome measures

      Surveys of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors and two 24-hour telephone dietary recalls at baseline and after an 8-week intervention period.

      Statistical analyses

      Examined time-by-treatment interactions in outcome measures.

      Results

      Compared to controls, NRF participants increased meal planning (+24.2% vs −4.9%; P<0.01), ability to identify nutrient-rich foods (+60.2% vs +24.6%; P<0.001), and use of shopping lists (+14.1% vs +3.3%; nonsignificant trend), and consumed more vegetables and fruits (P<0.05). NRF participants improved overall diet quality as shown by their scores on the Healthy Eating Index (P=0.04) and NRF scale scores (nonsignificant trend). Significant improvements were observed in Healthy Eating Index component scores for total fruit; whole fruit; whole grains; saturated fat; and energy from solid fats, alcohol, and added sugars.

      Conclusions

      Findings of this study showed that a consumer education program increased participants' use of the NRF approach and improved diet quality. Larger and longer-term studies are needed to confirm the findings and better understand processes of change.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005.
        6th ed. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC2005
        • Katz D.L.
        • Njike V.Y.
        • Rhee L.Q.
        • Reingold A.
        • Ayoob K.T.
        Performance characteristics of NuVal and the Overall Nutritional Quality Index (ONQI).
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91: 1102S-1108S
        • Sutherland L.A.
        • Kaley L.A.
        • Fischer L.
        Guiding Stars: The effect of a nutrition navigation program on consumer purchases at the supermarket.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91: 1090S-1094S
        • Lupton J.R.
        • Balentine D.A.
        • Black R.M.
        • et al.
        The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition labeling program: Rationale and development of the nutrition criteria.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91: 1078S-1089S
        • Drewnowski A.
        The Nutrient Rich Foods Index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91: 1095S-1101S
        • Townsend M.S.
        Where is the science?.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91: 1109S-1115S
        • Gerrior S.A.
        Nutrient profiling systems: Are science and the consumer connected?.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91: 1116S-1117S
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Fulgoni V.
        Nutrient profiling of foods: Creating a Nutrient-Rich Food Index.
        Nutr Rev. 2008; 66: 23-29
        • Fulgoni V.L.
        • Keast D.R.
        • Drewnowski A.
        Development and validation of the Nutrient-Rich Foods Index: A tool to measure nutritional quality of foods.
        J Nutr. 2009; 139: 1549-1554
        • McAlister A.L.
        • Perry C.L.
        • Parcel G.S.
        How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact: Social cognitive theory.
        in: Glanz K. Rimer B.K. Viswanath K. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice. 4th ed. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA2008: 167-188
        • Rudd J.
        • Glanz K.
        How individuals use information for health action: Consumer Information Processing.
        in: Glanz K. Lewis F.M. Rimer B.K. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA1990: 115-139
        • Montano D.E.
        • Kasprzyk D.
        Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model.
        in: Glanz K. Rimer B.K. Viswanath K. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice. 4th ed. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA2008: 67-92
      2. MyPyramid.gov Web site.
        (Accessed February 1, 2010)
      3. Nutrition Facts Label Web site.
        (Accessed February 2, 2011)
        • Guthrie J.F.
        • Stommes E.
        • Voichick J.
        Evaluating food stamp nutrition education: Issues and opportunities.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38: 6-11
        • Hartline-Grafton H.H.
        • Nyman R.
        • Briefel R.
        • Cohen R.
        US Department of Agriculture Web site.
        (Accessed February 12, 2010)
      4. Food and Drug Administration Web site.
        (Accessed February 10, 2010)
        • Glanz K.
        • Basil M.
        • Maibach E.
        • Goldberg J.
        • Snyder D.
        Why Americans eat what they do: Taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control as influences on food consumption.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1998; 98: 1118-1126
        • Guenther P.M.
        • Reedy J.
        • Krebs-Smith S.M.
        • Reeve B.B.
        • Basiotis P.P.
        • Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, US Department of Agriculture Web site
        Development and evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2005: Technical report 2007.
        (Accessed February 12, 2010)
        • Donald S.G.
        • Lang K.
        Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data.
        Rev Econ Stat. 2007; 89: 221-233
        • Miller G.D.
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Fulgoni V.
        • Heaney R.P.
        • King J.
        • Kennedy E.
        Is it time for a positive approach to dietary guidance using nutrient density as a basic principle?.
        J Nutr. 2009; 139: 1198-1202
        • Mobley A.R.
        • Kraemer D.
        • Nicholls J.
        Putting the nutrient-rich foods index into practice.
        J Am Coll Nutr. 2009; 28: 427S-435S
        • Grunert K.
        • Wills J.
        A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels.
        J Publ Health. 2007; 15: 385-399
        • Reedy J.
        • Kirkpatrick S.I.
        The use of proprietary nutrient profiling tools in nutrition science and policy: A commentary.
        Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40: 581-582
        • Chiuve S.E.
        • Sampson L.
        • Willett W.C.
        The association between a nutrition quality index and risk of chronic disease.
        Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40: 505-513

      Biography

      K. Glanz is George A. Weiss University professor, University of Pennsylvania Schools of Medicine and Nursing, Philadelphia.

      Biography

      J. Hersey is a senior scientist, RTI International, Washington, DC.

      Biography

      S. Cates is a senior policy analyst, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.

      Biography

      M. Muth is a program director, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.

      Biography

      D. Creel is a statistician, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.

      Biography

      J. Nicholls is vice president of nutrition affairs, National Dairy Council, Rosemont, IL.

      Biography

      V. Fulgoni is senior vice president, Nutrition Impact, LLC, Battle Creek, MI.

      Biography

      S. Zaripheh is senior nutrition scientist, SaraLee Corporation, Downers Grove, IL; at the time of the study, she was director of nutrition research, National Dairy Council, Rosemont, IL.