Advertisement

NOTICE: We are experiencing technical issues with Academy members trying to log into the JAND site using Academy member login credentials. We are working to resolve the issue as soon as possible. Alternatively, if you are an Academy member, you can access the JAND site by registering for an Elsevier account and claiming access using the links at the top of the JAND site. Email us at [email protected] for assistance. Thanks for your patience!

Location, Location, Location: Eye-Tracking Evidence that Consumers Preferentially View Prominently Positioned Nutrition Information

      Abstract

      Background

      Nutrition Facts labels can keep consumers better informed about their diets' nutritional composition, however, consumers currently do not understand these labels well or use them often. Thus, modifying existing labels may benefit public health.

      Objective

      The present study tracked the visual attention of individuals making simulated food-purchasing decisions to assess Nutrition Facts label viewing. Primary research questions were how self-reported viewing of Nutrition Facts labels and their components relates to measured viewing and whether locations of labels and specific label components relate to viewing.

      Design

      The study involved a simulated grocery shopping exercise conducted on a computer equipped with an eye-tracking camera. A post-task survey assessed self-reported nutrition information viewing, health behaviors, and demographics.

      Subjects/setting

      Individuals 18 years old and older and capable of reading English words on a computer (n=203) completed the 1-hour protocol at the University of Minnesota during Spring 2010.

      Statistical analyses

      Primary analyses included χ2, analysis of variance, and t tests comparing self-reported and measured viewing of label components in different presentation configurations.

      Results

      Self-reported viewing of Nutrition Facts label components was higher than objectively measured viewing. Label components at the top of the label were viewed more than those at the bottom, and labels positioned in the center of the screen were viewed more than those located on the sides.

      Conclusions

      Nutrition Facts label position within a viewing area and position of specific components on a label relate to viewing. Eye tracking is a valuable technology for evaluating consumers' attention to nutrition information, informing nutrition labeling policy (eg, front-of-pack labels), and designing labels that best support healthy dietary decisions.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wang Y.
        • Beydoun M.A.
        • Liang L.
        • Caballero B.
        • Kumanyika S.K.
        Will all Americans become overweight or obese?.
        Obesity. 2008; 16: 2323-2330
        • Spiegelman B.M.
        • Flier J.S.
        Obesity and the regulation of energy balance.
        Cell. 2001; 104: 531-543
        • Glanz K.
        • Basil M.
        • Maibach E.
        • Goldberg J.
        • Snyder D.
        Why Americans eat what they do: Taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1998; 98: 1118-1126
        • Dall T.M.
        • Fulgoni V.L.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Reimers K.J.
        • Packard P.T.
        • Astwood J.D.
        Potential health benefits and medical cost savings from calorie, sodium, and saturated fat reductions in the Amerian diet.
        Am J Health Promot. 2009; 23: 412-422
        • Wansink B.
        • Sobal J.
        Mindless eating—The 200 daily food decisions we overlook.
        Environ Behav. 2007; 39: 106-123
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Nayga Jr, R.M.
        • Capps Jr, O.
        The effect of food label use on nutrient intakes: An endogenous switching regression analysis.
        J Agric Resourc Econ. 2000; 25: 215-231
        • Cowburn G.
        • Stockley L.
        Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: A systematic review.
        Public Health Nutr. 2005; 8: 21-28
        • Goldberg J.H.
        • Probart C.K.
        • Zak R.E.
        Visual search of food nutrition labels.
        Hum Factors. 1999; 41: 425-437
        • Jones G.
        • Richardson M.
        An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements.
        Public Health Nutr. 2007; 10: 238-244
        • Visschers V.H.
        • Hess R.
        • Siegrist M.
        Health motivation and product design determine consumers' visual attention to nutrition information on food products.
        Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13: 1099-1106
        • National Cancer Institute
        Short dietary assessment instruments.
        (Updated November 9, 2009. Accessed December 21, 2010)
        • National Cancer Institute
        Validation results.
        (Updated August 13, 2008. Accessed December 21, 2010)
        • Paffenbarger Jr, R.S.
        • Wing A.L.
        • Hyde R.T.
        Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1978; 108: 161-175
        • Ainsworth B.E.
        • Leon A.S.
        • Richardson M.T.
        • Jacobs D.R.
        • Paffenbarger Jr, R.S.
        Accuracy of the College Alumnus Physical Activity Questionnaire.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46: 1403-1411
        • Rayner K.
        Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.
        Psychol Bull. 1998; 124: 372-422
        • Reichle E.D.
        • Rayner K.
        • Pollatsek A.
        The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.
        Behav Brain Sci. 2003; 26: 445-526
        • Faul F.
        • Erdfelder E.
        • Lang A.G.
        • Buchner A.
        G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
        Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191
      1. Graham DJ, Jeffery RW. Predictors of nutrition label viewing during food purchase decision making: An eye tracking investigation [published online ahead of print July 7, 2011]. Public Health Nutr. doi:10.1017/S1368980011001303.

        • US Food and Drug Administration
        How to understand and use the Nutrition Facts label.
        (Accessed October 24, 2010)
        • Grunert K.
        • Wills J.
        A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels.
        J Public Health. 2007; 15: 385-399
        • US Food and Drug Administration
        Nutrition Labeling and Education Act.
        (Accessed October 24, 2010)
        • van Kleef E.
        • van Trijp H.
        • Paeps F.
        • Fernandez-Celemin L.
        Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling.
        Public Health Nutr. 2008; 11: 203-213
        • Key Note
        E-Commerce: The Internet Grocery Market.
        Key Note Ltd, Hampton2007
        • Hand C.
        • Riley F.D.
        • Harris P.
        • Singh J.
        • Rettie R.
        Online grocery shopping: The influence of situational factors.
        Eur J Market. 2009; 43: 1205-1219
        • Hay L.R.
        • Nelson R.O.
        • Hay W.M.
        Methodological problems in the use of participant observers.
        J Appl Behav Anal. 1980; 13: 501-504
        • Gardner F.
        Methodological issues in the direct observation of parent-child interaction: Do observational findings reflect the natural behavior of participants?.
        Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2000; 3: 185-198

      Biography

      D. J. Graham is a research associate, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

      Biography

      R. W. Jeffery is a professor, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.