Advertisement
Research Research and Professional Brief| Volume 108, ISSUE 3, P549-552, March 2008

Risky Eating Behaviors of Young Adults—Implications for Food Safety Education

      Abstract

      Young adults engage in risky eating behaviors like eating raw/undercooked foods of animal origin that put them at increased risk for foodborne disease. This cross-sectional survey assessed the self-reported risky eating behaviors of young adults enrolled in higher education as a part of a large-scale survey administered over 10 months. Participants (N=4,343) completed a risky eating questionnaire by indicating which of the foods listed they consumed (the list included a random sequence of foods that are considered safe or risky to eat). Each risky food consumed earned one point, with the risky eating score calculated by summing points earned (range 0 to 27). Higher scores indicated more risky eating behaviors. Food safety knowledge and self-efficacy and stage of change for safe food handling were also assessed. Mean risky eating score (5.1±3.6) indicated that young adults consumed risky foods. Male respondents and whites consumed more risky foods compared with female respondents and nonwhites, respectively. As stage of change (movement to higher stages) and self-efficacy increased, risky eating score decreased; those who believed food poisoning was a personal threat tended to eat fewer risky foods. Regression models indicated that the strongest predictor of risky eating was self-efficacy score followed by stage of change. These variables, together with sex and race, explained about 10% of the variance in risky eating score. Although food safety knowledge correlated weakly with risky eating score, it did not significantly predict it. Efforts to improve current food-handling behaviors and self-efficacy through education are important to reduce prevalence of risky eating behaviors within this population.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety Inspection Service
        Changes in consumer knowledge, behavior, and confidence since the 1996 PR/HACCP final rule.
        (Accessed February 22, 2003)
        • Lando A.
        Food handling and consumption—Population estimates from the 1988-2006 FDA/FSIS food safety survey and 2006 demographic analysis.
        Presented at: USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service 2006 Food Safety Education Conference. 2006; (September, Denver, CO)
        • Fein S.
        • Levy A.
        • Lando A.
        Food safety survey.
        (Accessed April 29, 2007)
        • Kurtzweil P.
        Keeping food safety surveys honest.
        FDA Consumer. 1999; 33: 18-21
        • US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service
        New consumer research driving food safety education.
        Food Safety Educator. 1998; 3: 4
        • Altekruse S.
        • Yang S.
        • Timbo B.B.
        • Angulo F.J.
        A multi-state survey of consumer food-handling and food-consumption practices.
        Am J Prev Med. 1999; 16: 216-221
        • Yang S.
        • Leff M.G.
        • McTague D.
        • Horvath K.A.
        • Jackson-Thompson J.
        • Murayi T.
        • Oeselager G.K.
        • Melnik T.A.
        • Gildemaster M.C.
        • Ridings D.L.
        • Altekruse S.F.
        • Angulo F.J.
        Multistate surveillance for food-handling, preparation, and consumption behaviors associated with foodborne diseases: 1995 and 1996 BRFSS food-safety questions.
        MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1998; 47: 33-57
        • US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service
        New consumer research driving food safety education.
        (The Food Safety Educator 1998;3.) (Accessed January 22, 2008)
        • Fein S.
        • Lin C.T.
        • Levy A.
        Foodborne illness: Perceptions, experience, and preventive behaviors in the United States.
        J Food Protect. 1995; 58: 1405-1411
        • US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service
        FDA: Consumers are changing.
        Food Safety Educator. 1998; 3: 4
        • Williamson D.
        • Gravani R.
        • Lawless H.
        Correlating food safety knowledge with home food-preparation practices.
        Food Technol. 1992; 46: 94-100
      1. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food and water safety.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1997; 97: 1048-1053
        • Byrd-Bredbenner C.
        • Wheatley V.
        • Schaffner D.
        • Bruhn C.
        • Blalock L.
        • Maurer J.
        Development of food safety psychosocial questionnaires for young adults.
        J Food Sci Educ. 2007; 6: 30-37
        • Byrd-Bredbenner C.
        • Wheatley V.
        • Schaffner D.
        • Bruhn C.
        • Blalock L.
        • Maurer J.
        Development and implementation of a food safety knowledge instrument.
        J Food Sci Educ. 2007; 6: 46-55
        • Prochaska J.
        • Velicer W.
        The Transtheoretical Model of health behavior change.
        Am J Health Promot. 1997; 12: 38-48
        • Unklesbay N.
        • Sneed J.
        • Toma R.
        College students’ attitudes, practices, and knowledge of food safety.
        J Food Protect. 1998; 61: 1175-1180
        • McArthur L.
        • Holbert D.
        • Forsythe W.A.
        College students and awareness of food safety.
        J Fam Consumer Sci. 2007; 99: 60-67
        • Morrone M.
        • Rathbun A.
        Health education and food safety behavior in the University setting.
        J Environ Health. 2003; 65: 9-15
        • Ajzen I.
        Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior.
        J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002; 32: 665-683
        • Bandura A.
        Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
        Psychol Rev. 1977; 84: 191-215
        • Conner M.
        • Norman P.
        • Bell R.
        The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating.
        Health Psychol. 2002; 21: 194-201
        • Maiman L.A.
        • Becker M.H.
        The Health Belief Model: Origins and correlates in psychological theory.
        Health Educ Monogr. 1974; 2: 336-353
        • McCaul K.D.
        • Sandgren A.K.
        • O’Neill H.K.
        • Hinsz V.B.
        The value of the theory of planned behavior, perceived control, and self-efficacy expectations for predicting health-protective behaviors.
        Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 1993; 14: 231-252
        • Montano D.
        • Kasprzyk D.
        The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior.
        in: Glanz K. Rimer B. Lewis F. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA2002: 67-98
        • Prochaska J.
        • Velicer W.
        The Transtheoretical model of health behavior change.
        Am J Health Promot. 1997; 12: 38-48
        • Weinstein N.
        • Sandman P.
        The precaution adoption process model.
        in: Glanz K. Rimer B. Lewis F. Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA2002: 121-143
        • AbuSabha R.
        • Achterberg C.
        Review of self-efficacy and locus of control for nutrition and health-related behavior.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1997; 97: 1122-1133
        • Bandura A.
        Health promotion from the perspective of Social Cognitive Theory.
        in: Norman P. Abraham C. Conner M. Understanding and Changing Health Behaviour. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands2000: 299-339
        • Conner M.
        • Warren R.
        • Close S.
        • Sparks P.
        Alcohol consumption and the theory of planned behavior: An examination of the cognitive mediation of past behavior.
        J Appl Soc Psychol. 1999; 29: 1675-1703
        • Dennis K.E.
        • Goldberg A.P.
        Weight control self-efficacy types and transitions affect weight-loss outcomes in obese women.
        Addict Behav. 1996; 21: 103-117
        • Quah S.R.
        Social science and illness prevention: An overview of the Health Belief Model.
        J Soc Econ Stud. 1986; 3: 345-357
        • Ratzan S.C.
        • Payne J.G.
        • Massett H.A.
        Effective health message design: America responds to AIDS campaign.
        Am Behav Sci. 1994; 38: 294-309
        • Rodgers W.M.
        • Brawley L.R.
        The influence of outcome expectancy and self-efficacy on the behavioral intentions of novice exercisers.
        J Appl Soc Psychol. 1996; 26: 618-625
        • Morris D.
        • Penhollow T.
        Impact of a knowledge-based foodborne illness program on food safety practices among college students 2005.
        Presented at American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance National Convention and Exposition. 2005 (April 7-17, Chicago, IL)
        • US Department of Education and Institute of Education Services
        Table 171.
        (Accessed August 22, 2006)

      Biography

      C. Byrd-Bredbenner is a professor of nutrition/extension specialist, J. M. Abbot is a postdoctoral associate, V. Wheatley is a research assistant, D. Schaffner is a professor of food science/extension specialist, and L. Blalock is an assistant professor of youth development/extension specialist, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

      Biography

      C. Bruhn is a consumer food marketing specialist, University of California, Davis.