From the Association ADA Report| Volume 106, ISSUE 4, P601-607, April 2006

Download started.


Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food and Nutrition Misinformation


        It is the position of the American Dietetic Association (ADA) that food and nutrition misinformation can have harmful effects on the health, well-being, and economic status of consumers. Nationally credentialed dietetics professionals working in health care, academia, public health, the media, government, and the food industry are uniquely qualified to advocate for and promote science-based nutrition information to the public, function as primary nutrition educators to health professionals, and actively correct food and nutrition misinformation. Enormous scientific advances have been made in the area of food and nutrition, leading to a fine-tuning of recommendations about healthful eating. Consumers have become increasingly aware of the nutrition–health link and reliant on nutrition information to base their decisions, and have assumed partial responsibility for changing their eating behaviors. Unfortunately, these same trends also create opportunities for food and nutrition misinformation to flourish. News reports rarely provide enough context for consumers to interpret or apply the advice given, and preliminary findings often attract unmerited and misleading attention. Effective nutrition communication must be consumer-friendly and contain sufficient context to allow consumers to consider the information and determine whether it applies to their unique health and nutritional needs. Consistent with ADA’s organizational vision that members “are the leading source of nutrition expertise,” ADA recognizes its responsibility to help consumers identify food and nutrition misinformation in the following ways: (a) ADA members should provide consumers with sound, science-based nutrition information and help them to recognize misinformation; (b) ADA members need to be the primary source of sound, science-based nutrition information for the media and to inform them when misinformation is presented; and (c) ADA members should continue to diligently work with other health care practitioners, educators, policy makers, and food and dietary supplement industry representatives to responsibly address the health and psychological, physiological, and economic effects of nutrition-related misinformation.
        To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

        Purchase one-time access:

        Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
        One-time access price info
        • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
        • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


        Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
        Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
        Already an online subscriber? Sign in
        Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


          • American Dietetic Association
          Position of the American Dietetic Association.
          J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102: 260-266
          • American Dietetic Association
          Nutrition and You: Trends 2002: Final Report of Findings. 2002 (October . Available at: Accessed December 28, 2005.)
          • US Department of Health and Human Services
          US Surgeon General’s Report on Nutrition and Health. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC1988: 696 (PHS) Publication no. 88-50210.
          • Duyff R.
          American Dietetic Association Complete Food and Nutrition Guide. 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York, NY2002
          • Wansink B.
          Marketing Nutrition. University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL2005
          • Federal Trade Commission
          Endorsement Policy Statement on Food Advertising. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC1994
          • Andrews J.C.
          • Burton S.
          • Netemeyer R.G.
          Are some comparative nutrition claims misleading? The role of nutrition knowledge, ad claim type and disclosure conditions.
          J Advertising. 2000; 29: 29-42
          • Wansink B.
          • Chandon P.
          Do “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity?.
          J Marketing Res. 2006 (In press.)
          • Greger J.L.
          Dietary supplement use.
          J Nutr. 2001; 131: S1339-S1343
          • US Department of Health and Human Services
          Health, Information and the Use of Questionable Treatments. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC1987
          • Sarubin A.
          The Health Professional’s Guide to Popular Dietary Supplements. American Dietetic Association, Chicago, IL2000
        1. The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. 1994 (Pub L No. 103-417 (S 784) (codified at 42 USC §287C-11))
          • Wansink B.
          • Huckabee M.
          De-marketing obesity.
          California Manage Rev. 2005; 49: 1-13
          • Food Marketing Institute
          Trends in American Eating Patterns 2002. Food Marketing Institute, Washington, DC2002
          • Rowe S.B.
          Communicating science-based food and nutrition information.
          J Nutr. 2002; 132: S2481-S2482
          • Wansink B.
          Mindless Eating. Bantam-Dell, New York, NY2006
          • International Food Information Council
          Food for Thought VI. 2005 (Available at: Accessed December 21, 2005.)
          • Winker M.A.
          • Flanagin A.
          • Chi-Lum B.
          • White J.
          • Andrews K.
          • Kennett R.L.
          • DeAngelis C.D.
          • Musacchio R.A.
          Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet.
          JAMA. 2000; 283: 1600-1606
          • Coleman E.
          Nutrition Quackery. Nutrition Dimension, Eureka, CA1998
          • Goldberg J.P.
          Nutrition communication in the 21st century.
          Nutrition. 2000; 16: 644-646
          • Harper A.
          Nutr Today. 1988; 23: 8-17
          • Short S.H.
          Health quackery.
          J Am Diet Assoc. 1994; 94: 607-611
          • Brown H.
          • Cassileth B.R.
          • Lewis J.P.
          • Renner J.H.
          Alternative medicine—or quackery?.
          Patient Care. 1994; 28: 80-97
          • MacLaren T.
          Messages for the masses.
          J Am Diet Assoc. 1997; 97: 733-734
          • Food Marketing Institute
          The Dietary Guideline Alliance.
          Reaching Consumers with Meaningful Health Messages. 1996 (Available at: Accessed January 27, 2006.)
          • Stahl P.
          Status report on nutrition in the news.
          J Am Diet Assoc. 2000; 100: 1298-1299
        2. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005. Available at: Accessed December 28, 2005.

        3. US Department of Agriculture. MyPyramid. Available at: Accessed January 4, 2006.