Advertisement

NOTICE: We are experiencing technical issues with Academy members trying to log into the JAND site using Academy member login credentials. We are working to resolve the issue as soon as possible. Alternatively, if you are an Academy member, you can access the JAND site by registering for an Elsevier account and claiming access using the links at the top of the JAND site. Email us at [email protected] for assistance. Thanks for your patience!

The Rising Cost of Low-Energy-Density Foods

      Abstract

      Background

      Consuming lower-energy-density foods is one recommended strategy for management of body weight. This cross-sectional study used retail food prices to test the hypothesis that low-energy-density foods are not only more costly per kilocalorie, but have increased disproportionately in price as compared to high-energy-density foods.

      Design

      For a list of 372 foods and beverages belonging to a food frequency questionnaire database, retail prices were obtained from major supermarket chains in the Seattle, WA, metropolitan area in 2004 and 2006. Energy density of all items was calculated and prices were expressed as $/100 g edible portion and as $/1,000 kcal. Foods were stratified by quintiles of energy density and the differences in energy cost and in percent price change were tested using analyses of variance.

      Results

      High-energy-density foods provided the most dietary energy at least cost. Energy cost of foods in the bottom quintile of energy density, beverages excluded, was $18.16/1,000 kcal as compared to only $1.76/1,000 kcal for foods in the top quintile. The 2-year price change for the least energy-dense foods was +19.5%, whereas the price change for the most energy-dense foods was −1.8%.

      Conclusion

      The finding that energy-dense foods are not only the least expensive, but also most resistant to inflation, may help explain why the highest rates of obesity continue to be observed among groups of limited economic means. The sharp price increase for the low-energy-density foods suggests that economic factors may pose a barrier to the adoption of more healthful diets and so limit the impact of dietary guidance.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Andrieu E.
        • Darmon N.
        • Drewnowski A.
        Low-cost diets: More energy, fewer nutrients.
        Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006; 60: 434-436
        • Drewnowski A.
        The role of energy density.
        Lipids. 2003; 38: 109-115
        • Darmon N.
        • Briend A.
        • Drewnowski A.
        Energy-dense diets are associated with lower diet costs: A community study of French adults.
        Public Health Nutr. 2004; 7: 21-27
        • Darmon N.
        • Ferguson E.L.
        • Briend A.
        A cost constraint alone has adverse effects on food selection and nutrient density: An analysis of human diets by linear programming.
        J Nutr. 2002; 132: 3764-3771
        • Ledikwe J.H.
        • Blanck H.M.
        • Kettel Khan L.
        • Serdula M.K.
        • Seymour J.D.
        • Tohill B.C.
        • Rolls B.J.
        Low-energy-density diets are associated with high diet quality in adults in the United States.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106: 1172-1180
        • Ledikwe J.H.
        • Blanck H.M.
        • Kettel Khan L.
        • Serdula M.K.
        • Seymour J.D.
        • Tohill B.C.
        • Rolls B.J.
        Dietary energy density is associated with energy intake and weight status in US adults.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83: 1362-1368
        • Schröder H.
        • Marrugat J.
        • Covas M.I.
        High monetary costs of dietary patterns associated with lower body mass index: A population-based study.
        Int J Obes (Lond). 2006; 10: 1574-1579
        • Rolls B.J.
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Ledikwe J.H.
        Changing the energy density of the diet as a strategy for weight management.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2005; 105: S98-S103
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Specter S.E.
        Poverty and obesity: The role of energy density and energy costs.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 79: 6-16
        • Drewnowski A.
        Obesity and the food environment: Dietary energy density and diet costs.
        Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27: 154-162
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Darmon N.
        The economics of obesity: Dietary energy density and energy cost.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82: 265S-273S
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Darmon N.
        • Briend A.
        Replacing fats and sweets with vegetables and fruits—A question of cost.
        Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 1555-1559
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Monsivais P.
        • Maillot M.
        • Darmon N.
        Low-energy-density diets are associated with higher diet quality and higher diet costs in French adults.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107: 1028-1032
        • Sturm R.
        • Datar A.
        Body mass index in elementary school children, metropolitan area food prices and food outlet density.
        Public Health. 2005; 119: 1059-1068
        • Putnam J.
        • Allshouse J.
        • Kantor L.S.
        US Per capita food supply trends: more calories, refined carbohydrates, and fats.
        FoodReview. 2003; 25: 2-15
        • Newby P.K.
        Examining energy density: Comments on diet quality, dietary advice, and the cost of healthful eating.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106: 1166-1169
        • Block D.
        • Kouba J.
        A comparison of the availability and affordability of a market basket in two communities in the Chicago area.
        Public Health Nutr. 2006; 9: 837-845
        • Neuhouser M.L.
        • Rock C.L.
        • Eldridge A.L.
        • Kristal A.R.
        • Patterson R.E.
        • Cooper D.A.
        • Neumark-Sztainer D.
        • Cheskin L.J.
        • Thornquist M.D.
        Serum concentrations of retinal, alpha-tocopherol and the carotenoids are influenced by diet, race and obesity in a sample of healthy adolescents.
        J Nutr. 2001; 131: 2184-2191
        • Patterson R.E.
        • Kristal A.R.
        • Carter R.A.
        • Fels-Tinker L.
        • Bolton M.P.
        • Agurs-Collins T.
        Measurement characteristics of the Women’s Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire.
        Ann Epidemiol. 1999; 9: 178-187
      1. Tice C. Putting the “grow” in grocery. Puget Sound Business Journal. January 17, 2003. Available at: http://seattle.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2003/01/20/story5.html. Accessed April 7, 2004.

      2. Food yields summarized by different stages of preparation. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Agricultural Handbook no. 102. Washington, DC; 1975.

      3. Report of the dietary guidelines advisory committee on the dietary guidelines for Americans.
        US Department of Agriculture and Health and Human Services, Washington, DC2005
      4. US Department of Agriculture. Steps to a healthier you. Available at: http://www.MyPyramid.gov. Accessed January 15, 2007.

        • Fung T.T.
        • Rimm E.B.
        • Spiegelman D.
        • Rifai N.
        • Tofler G.H.
        • Willett W.C.
        • Hu F.B.
        Association between dietary patterns and plasma biomarkers of obesity and cardiovascular disease risk.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2001; 73: 61-67
        • Kant A.K.
        Dietary patterns and health outcomes.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2004; 104: 615-635
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Darmon N.
        Food choices and diet costs: An economic analysis.
        J Nutr. 2005; 135: 900-904
        • Darmon N.
        • Darmon M.
        • Maillot M.
        • Drewnowski A.
        A nutrient density standard for vegetables and fruits: Nutrients per calorie and nutrients per unit cost.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2005; 105: 1881-1887
      5. Consumer Price Index. All urban consumers (current series). Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC. Available at: http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/outside.jsp?survey=cu. Accessed February, 2007.

      6. Lakdawalla D, Philipson T. The growth of obesity and technological change: A theoretical and empirical examination. Natl Bur Econ Res. Working Paper No. 8946, Cambridge, MA. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w8946. Accessed October 25, 2006.

      7. Cutler DM, Glaeser EL, Shapiro JM. Why have Americans become more obese? Natl Bur Econ Res. Working Paper No. 8946 Cambridge, MA. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w9446. Accessed October 25, 2006.

        • Finkelstein E.A.
        • Ruhm C.J.
        • Kosa K.M.
        Economic causes and consequences of obesity.
        Ann Rev Public Health. 2005; 26: 239-257
        • Sturm R.
        Childhood obesity—What we can learn from existing data on societal trends, part 2.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2005; 2: A20
        • Clauson A.
        • McCray D.
        Food price changes vary regionally.
        FoodReview. 1997; 20: 5-7
      8. Leibtag ES, Kaufman PR. Exploring food purchase behavior of low-income households: How do they economize? Agriculture Information Bulletin no. 747-07, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2003.

        • Willett W.C.
        Nutritional Epidemiology.
        2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY1998
        • Darmon N.
        • Ferguson E.
        • Briend A.
        Do economic constraints encourage the selection of energy dense diets?.
        Appetite. 2003; 41: 315-322
        • Zenk S.N.
        • Schulz A.J.
        • Israel B.A.
        • James S.A.
        • Bao S.
        • Wilson M.L.
        Fruit and vegetable access differs by community racial composition and socioeconomic position in Detroit, Michigan.
        Ethn Dis. 2006; 16: 275-280
        • Kant A.K.
        • Graubard B.I.
        Secular trends in patterns of self-reported food consumption of adult Americans: NHANES 1971-1975 to NHANES 1999-2002.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 84: 1215-1223
        • Baranowski T.
        • Cullen K.W.
        • Nicklas T.
        • Thompson D.
        • Baranowski J.
        Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts?.
        Obes Res. 2003; 11: 23S-43S
        • Schoonover H.
        • Muller M.
        Food Without Thought: How US Farm Policy Contributes to Obesity.
        Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Minneapolis, MN2006 (March)
      9. US Department of Agriculture. 2007 Farm bill proposals. Farm Bill Fact Sheet. United States Department of Agriculture. Release no. 0019.07 Washington, DC, March 2007. Available at: http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=2007/01/0019.xml. Accessed February 2, 2007.

      Biography

      P. Monsivais is a research fellow in the Nutritional Sciences Program, School of Public Health and Community Medicine and the Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle.

      Biography

      A. Drewnowski is professor and director, Nutritional Sciences Program, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.